Campus Switching and Routing

Reply
New Contributor

VSF with OOBM-MAD

Does anyone know how to test my VSF with OOBM-MAD setup.

Here is a copy of the relevant parts of the VSF config just to make sure I did it right.

 

vsf
enable domain 1
member 1
type "J9850A" mac-address 94f128-
priority 128
link 1 1/B8
link 1 name "I-Link1_1"
exit
member 2
type "J9850A" mac-address 94f128-
priority 128
link 1 2/B8
link 1 name "I-Link2_1"
exit
oobm-mad
port-speed 10g
exit

 

oobm
no ip address
vsf member 1
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
exit
vsf member 2
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
exit
I have a cable connected directly from OOBM Member1 to OOBM Member2.

 

 

If i run a show vsf lldp-mad status  it doesnt really return any relevant info, I assume because I have a oobm-mad setup, and not setup on a "normal port"

 

show vsf lldp-mad status

MAD device IP : 0.0.0.0
MAD-probe portset :


VSF split : No
MAD probe originator : No
Number of probe requests sent : 0
Number of probe responses received : 0
MAD Active Fragment : Yes



I guess I can just disconnect the VSF link, but what would I be looking for to verify the OOBM-MAD is working as expected.

Thanks in advance.

 

Darron

Contributor I

Re: VSF with OOBM-MAD

We have test this in the past. The are some mad commands/ statistics available when using the command show obbm (or sub command within oobm). More information is not available. Make sure the oobm interfaces can reach each other.

To make sure its working enforce a split brain situation
Willem Bargeman
ACMX#935 | ACCX #822
New Contributor

Re: VSF with OOBM-MAD

I appreciate the reply, I really should have tested the split brain, but I am unfortunatly beyond that point now.  

I ran some of the show oobm commands, it looks like it is working, but it isnt very specific to oobm-mad.

I have two vsf links so I just hope they never go bad at the same time, and i suppose if they do that the oobm-mad actually works....

 

Thanks again,

Darron

Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: