Controllerless Networks

last person joined: yesterday 

Instant Mode - the controllerless Wi-Fi solution that's easy to set up, is loaded with security and smarts, and won't break your budget
Expand all | Collapse all

IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

This thread has been viewed 1 times
  • 1.  IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    Posted Sep 14, 2012 01:47 AM

    I have to enable a 11n access within a SSID Hidden mode.

    But it doesn't work in a particular cirumstance, and it could only connect by 11a.

     

    IAP product: IAP-105

    IAP Version:3.0.0.1

    Wireless Chip:Ralink RT2870 (USB Adapter type)

    Chip Driver:3.2.9.0

     

    First, I tried it In SSID Hidden mode.

    -When I tried it on a Windows XP desktop, It works well. I could get a 11n 300Mbps access.

    -When I tried it on a Windows 7 desktop, I could only get a 11a 54Mbps access.

     

    Secondly, I tried it In SSID Not Hidden mode.

    -When I tried it on a Windows XP desktop, It works well. I could get a 11n 300Mbps access.

    -When I tried it on a Windows 7 desktop, It works well. I could get a 11n 300Mbps access. 

     

     Then,I tried it in a cotroller based circumstance. It is consisted with Aruba 650 and AP-105

     -Either the desktops' OS is XP or 7and either the SSID mode is Hidden or Not Hidden, 

      It works well. I could get a 11n 300Mbps access.

     

    I tried these by a windows wireless utility and also by a Chipset vendors' utility,

    but the consequence was the same.

     

    So, this seems to be a combination problem between IAP, RT2870 and Windows7, as when I

    tried the same in a Laptop with Intel WiFI Chip set, it worked well.

     

    What I am concerned is why the result differs between an IAP circumstance and a Controller

    based circumstance.

     

    Has anyone been faced to a same trouble?  I wish someone could give me an help to solve

    this problem.

     

    Regards,

     

     

     

     

     

     



  • 2.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Sep 14, 2012 04:06 AM

    What encryption are you using, if any, on that wireless network?

     



  • 3.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    Posted Sep 14, 2012 10:31 AM

    Thank you for your reply cjoseph.

     

    I am using WPA2-Enterprise(AES) for encryption.

     

     



  • 4.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Sep 14, 2012 07:18 PM

    Are you sure that none of those devices are using TKIP?

     

    To find out type this on the commandline:

     


    "show dot1x supplicant-info list-all "



  • 5.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    Posted Sep 15, 2012 10:57 PM

    I'm sure. Cause once I was trying it by TKIP, and found it worthless.

    Nevetheless, I'll try that comand and would post the results.



  • 6.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    Posted Sep 17, 2012 09:12 PM

    I have tried the command "show dot1x supplicant-info list-all " , but it seems that it doesnt exist as a command for IAPs.

     

    Nevertheless, I saw the command working on an Aruba 650. And saw the cleint trying to connect by wpa2-AES.

     

    For an IAP, I confirmed the "show running config" and saw the opmode as wpa2-AES



  • 7.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Sep 17, 2012 09:59 PM

    My fault.  I did not see IAP.

     

    Please make sure that your Advanced Client properties is not limiting them to 54 megs.

     

    If that does not work, please open a support case.

     

     



  • 8.  RE: IAP105 & Windows7: Cannot connect by 11n when enabling "SSID Hide" on

    Posted Sep 17, 2012 11:57 PM

    I haven't limit them to to 54 megs. Well I will try to open a case.

     

    Anyway, If somebody has encountered to a situation like this, please let me know.