Network Management

Reply

Airwaves with Motorola Controllers

Hello everyone!

i was wondering if someone got experience with Airwaves and motorola?

Myselft i just got experience with Aruba Wireless controllers with airwaves...

 

I was wondering what do i need from Motorola to make this work correctly?

 

Do i just need the SNMP V2 be configured on the controller of motoroal and the Community string  to make it work and that way i wll able to see the APS and the Wireless controller of motorola?

I ask this because i want to run a Demo to a client which is using motorolado and Aruba Mix enviroment and we are trying to offer them Airwaves to monitor both systems...

 

Cheers

Carlos

----------------------------------------------------
Product Manager - Aruba Networks
Alternetworks Corp
Moderator

Re: Airwaves with Motorola Controllers

Hi Carlos

 

Just make sure your customer has motorola version 4 or earlier equipment. If that's the case, you're good to go.

 

Regards

Samuel Pérez
ACMP, ACCP, ACDX#100

---

If I answerd your question, please click on "Accept as Solution".
If you find this post useful, give me kudos for it ;)

Re: Airwaves with Motorola Controllers

I guess i should be good to go! i already checked also on the hardware list that their controller is compatible with airwaves.

 

Thanks Samuel!

Let see how the Demo goes! :)

 

Cheers

Carlos

----------------------------------------------------
Product Manager - Aruba Networks
Alternetworks Corp

Re: Airwaves with Motorola Controllers

I have had very problematic experiences with Motorola Wing 4.x where APs would show offline when performing an SNMPWALK on the specific OID that lists the AP table.

 

Airwave sometimes reported false downs because of this. This issue is related to Wing 4.x and not Airwave, just keep that in mind.

 

Any wing 5.x support coming soon?

Pasquale Monardo | Senior Network Solutions Consultant
ACDX #420 | ACMP
[If you found my post helpful, please give kudos!]
Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: