Yes, it would be released sooner, but then snapped up by another device that probably doesn't want to use the CP!
I think as we have so much foot traffic through site, and probably thousands of devices trying to connect (although not actually use CP), the supporting network was never big enough to accommodate them... So its probably down to poor design that resulted in the scopes being exhausted fairly quickly.
My personal feeling is why have lots of /24 networks available just so devices can connect, but never actually use the network? I had thought of having a larger subnet, but am sure I have read, and been advised that you don't really want more than say 200 clients per vlan. I was even told this at the bootcamp, although was actually told that you wont see this written anywhere!
Also, surely all of these devices that are connected to the open wifi, although not authenticated, are all trying to update and download apps etc, all of which is consuming resources unnecessarily.
This of course is just my way of thinking about it!