Wired Intelligent Edge

last person joined: yesterday 

Bring performance and reliability to your network with the HPE Aruba Networking Core, Aggregation, and Access layer switches. Discuss the latest features and functionality of your switching devices, and find ways to improve security across your network to bring together a mobile-first solution
Expand all | Collapse all

ArubaOS-CX 10.01 VSX: Keep Alive deployed using a Layer 3 dynamic aggregation group?

This thread has been viewed 5 times
  • 1.  ArubaOS-CX 10.01 VSX: Keep Alive deployed using a Layer 3 dynamic aggregation group?

    MVP GURU
    Posted Jul 25, 2018 06:07 PM

    Hello,

     

    Is it possible to deploy the Keepalive link using a dedicated Layer 3 dynamic aggregation group interface instead of just using a dedicated single routed interface?

     

    Something like (considering also a dedicated VRF):

     

    switch(config)# vrf keep-alive-link
    switch(config)# interface lag 127
    switch(config-lag-if)# no shutdown
    switch(config-lag-if)# lacp mode active
    switch(config-lag-if)# ip address a.b.c.d/31
    switch(config-lag-if)# vrf attach keep-alive-link
    switch(config-lag-if)# interface 1/1/47
    switch(config-if)# lag 127
    switch(config-if)# no shutdown
    switch(config-if)# interface 1/1/48
    switch(config-if)# lag 127
    switch(config-if)# no shutdown

     

    Kind regards, Davide.



  • 2.  RE: ArubaOS-CX 10.01 VSX: Keep Alive deployed using a Layer 3 dynamic aggregation group?

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Jul 26, 2018 04:53 AM

    Hello,

    Yes this is possible however it does not bring much benefits. Keepalive is a protection mechanism in case of ISL failure. It is not required to have redanduncy for keepalive. However, it is important to make sure that keepalive communication is not impacted during ISL cut.



  • 3.  RE: ArubaOS-CX 10.01 VSX: Keep Alive deployed using a Layer 3 dynamic aggregation group?

    MVP GURU
    Posted Jul 26, 2018 05:38 AM

    Hello Vincent,

     

    Thanks for your explanation, pretty reasonable to use just a single link (more or less is exactly like IRF BFD). I asked because I was just wondering if creating a two interfaces LAG for the VSX Keepalive link would be, at first, possible and, if implemented, in case of VSX ISL links all down to have a more resilent heartbeat between VSX nodes would have helped (in any case, as suggested, a separate VRF specifically defined for VSX Keepalive should be used to keep it separated from anything could happen to VSX ISL).

     

    Kind regards, Davide.



  • 4.  RE: ArubaOS-CX 10.01 VSX: Keep Alive deployed using a Layer 3 dynamic aggregation group?

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Jul 26, 2018 05:58 AM

    Understood. I don't think that extra redundancy is justified as you consumme an other dedicated port for that. By the way, to minimize cost, as keepalive traffic is very small, you can use 1G speed.