11-12-2015 08:56 AM
I've got a 3200XM running standalone with 11x AP-125 access points in production currently. I have a need to add a few new AP's. I would like to use something like an AP-115 or AP-215 to add to the existing environment. My controller is running 6.3.1. Currently only doing WPA2-PSK & Captive Portal. Planning on introducing 802.1x with Microsoft NPS in the near future. Airgroup functionality is also very important to our environment.
I've already confirmed that both the controller & the AP's support 6.4 code. My question is, is this a good idea? My concern is that even though the controller & AP's officially support the code, that this could introduce problems. I would love to hear if anyone else is running 6.4 on similar hardware & what their experience has been. Let me know if you need anymore details on my side. Thanks in advance!
11-12-2015 10:01 AM
We currently have some 125's running with a 3200xm at 188.8.131.52 with no problem yet, or nothing has shown up yet.
We have everything from 125s to 325s in here.
11-13-2015 04:08 AM
The newer APs have better receive sensitivity and support 802.11ac so clients might stick to them better, but overall you should be fine.
Aruba Customer Engineering
Looking for an Answer? Search the Community Knowledge Base Here: Community Knowledge Base
11-13-2015 09:57 AM
Just another "me too". I run 6.4 code on my lab 3200. It's a non-XM, but with the memory upgrade... so effectively an XM. Being that it is a lab box, it doesn't see a great deal of use, but I left it running 24/7 and never had any issues with it running out of memory or the like.
I'm a big fan of the 3000 series boxes. They don't have the horsepower that the newer ones do, but I get the impression they're a little more stout.
11-13-2015 11:31 AM
Thanks, guys! This is good feedback. It sounds like this should work out just fine. My main concern was that the "older" controller & AP-125's might start to experience "buggy" behavior running the bleading edge code.