Wireless Access

Reply
Frequent Contributor II
Posts: 169
Registered: ‎11-18-2011

Routing to a particular external website as if it's internal

Hello all!

 

Ok - the title is a bit odd - but not sure what to say - we have a website that is hosted at a datacenter. If you are a customer, it gives you limited access, if you are an employee in the main office, it gives you admin access to the website.

 

So we have deployed the RAP5s at several locations and because we have split tunneling enabled on them, it considers this website an outside address and routes all requests to the limited access section. We need to have anybody on the RAP5 think it's coming from the main office, not that remote office - so we need to route that particular site thru the external ISP at the main office. (I hope that makes sense - I'm reading and going huh?)

 

This is so people at our London office can access the site with out needing to VPN to our main site to then open the browser to it.

 

let me know if you need more clarification.

 

Lirria

Aruba Employee
Posts: 100
Registered: ‎12-02-2011

Re: Routing to a particular external website as if it's internal

What ACLs are you using for split-tunneling?

 

Adding an ACL - (user host <ip-addrs of website> any permit) will send that traffic through the RAP tunnel. Is this what you are looking for?

Frequent Contributor II
Posts: 169
Registered: ‎11-18-2011

Re: Routing to a particular external website as if it's internal

That just might be it!

 

I'll give it a try and see what happens.


thank you!

 

Lirria

Frequent Contributor II
Posts: 169
Registered: ‎11-18-2011

Re: Routing to a particular external website as if it's internal

Sorry for delay in testing - work has been crazy - this did seem to fix the issue. You all are awesome!

 

Lirria

Occasional Contributor I
Posts: 9
Registered: ‎02-19-2008

Re: Routing to a particular external website as if it's internal

Could this solution be applied to VIA that is using Split-Tunnel as well?

Search Airheads
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: