Search the Community
- Global Forums
- ClearPass Recipe Review
- ClearPass Recipe Submission
- Admin Tool - Assign Role in Bulk
- Admin Tool - User Search
- CWNP Conf 2015
- Airheads Conference Vegas 2015
- Wlan Pro Conference 2015
- Airheads Conference Shanghai 2014
- WLAN Pro Conf EU 2014
- CWNP Conference 2014 (Sep 22 - 24)
- Airheads Local 2014
- Wireless Field Day 7 (Aug 6-8, 2014)
- Black Hat 2014 Contest
- Airheads EMEA Italy 2014 (June 9 - 13)
- Americas Airheads Conference 2014
- WLAN Professionals Summit 2014
- Airheads Roadshow 2013
- EMEA Airheads Conference 2013
- APJ Airheads Conference 2013
- Americas Airheads Conference 2013
- Americas Airheads Conference 2012
- APJ Airheads Conference 2012
- EMEA Airheads Conference 2012
- Airheads EMEA 2012 Contest: How to Enter - Contest Terms & Conditions
- Airheads EMEA 2012 Contest: Create your Entry to Win Here!
- Airheads Conferences Prior to 2012
- Americas Airheads Local Events 2012
- EMEA Airheads Local Events 2012
- Wireless Field Day 3 @ Aruba Networks
- Wireless Tech Field Day 2- Silicon Valley
- Wi-Fi Mobility Symposium- San Jose, CA USA
- SDN Apps
- Connector Translation Testing area
This controller has a "mobile" wlan. Not sure how to configure it. Is there some documentation that I can read about it? Thanks.
Can someone confirm that we can deploy Aruba clearpass in the Azure cloud with full functionality?
If so, please share any document which can be helpful in this regard.
Whole infrastructure services has been migrated to Azure including AD services. We do not have any...Whole infrastructure services has been migrated to Azure including AD services.
We do not have any any scope of having anything on primis.
We have also purchased the licencees for CPPM. What is the techinal limitation of not supporting in cloud?
The system requirements for ClearPass clearly state ESXi, Hyper-V or KVM as being supported pl...
The system requirements for ClearPass clearly state ESXi, Hyper-V or KVM as being supported platforms. If you have concerns, you should work with your Aruba or partner account team.
Can anyone confirm if the new MacOSX (Yosemite 10.10) still does not allow DIY supplicant configuration for EAP-TTLS (PAP) in 802.1x without using a "helper app" like XpressConnect?
Or did Apple reintroduce native PAP support?
I am doing an onboarding deployment for a local K12. As students graduate and devices are retired, will those onboarding licenses be able to be reused, or will the school be required to buy new onboarding licenses for the new incoming class? Also, where does ClearPass Guest keep count of the license status of onboarding?
Onboard is licensed based on the number of valid device credentials that have been provisioned. Tha...
Onboard is licensed based on the number of valid device credentials that have been provisioned. That is, as the crdentials expiry or are reovked they will be removed from the license count. We have seen some educational customers use expiry dates based on the final semester so the credentials are automatically released from the licensing count when the students leave.
So as some of you may have been reading here on the Higher Education boards, I am trying to twerk out my WIFI, get this right, make people happy and set the universe into balance for our environment. That being said I have been testing on a single building and have set the recommendations up as per a PDF that was linked to me in another thread.
Things seem to be good for Laptops/notebooks and tablets. Smart phones though (iPhone/Android) now have issues. Those issues being that they get nowhere on the wireless. Like that great kids toy from the '70s, they just Sit'n'Spin and never go anywhere.
- verified DHCP and all address/DNS information is correct on the devices
- tried statically assigning a smart phone, no difference
- verified that the devices are getting on the correct VLAN for their ROLE (this is a dot1x secure environment)
- verified that their authentication via ClearPass is correct and users are authenticating properly
- confirmed that Darth Vader is indeed Luke's father
- verified the quality of the physical wireless connections
- no ton of retransmits or anything of that nature
- SNR looks good
- have tested in multiple locations throughout the building and confirmed that its not happening on just a single AP (environment is a mix of AP93s, 105s and 225s)
So I could use some help here gang on what/where to troubleshoot next...
I think we may have solved this one. A little while back we migrated the VLANs for our dot...
I think we may have solved this one.
A little while back we migrated the VLANs for our dot1x environment off of our core switch to our Palo Alto 5050. It appears that in that transition we left the address for this particular VLAN on the core as well as putting it on the P.A. box. Once this was corrected, smart phones consistently began to work properly. So in essence it was an IP conflict which would explain its intermittent nature. Now why laptops still worked fine during all of this is still a mystery to me, but I'm not one to look a gift horse in the mouth so to speak.
So, so far so good!
On the plus side all of my actual wireless configurations have been vindicated! :-)
Thanks to Ryan for all the help, much appreciated!
Do we have any disadvantage or performance issues when running AP-225 in a high density area using POE 802.3af?
From my understanding 5GHz operate without any issues (Peformance the same regardless of the power)
in 2.4 Ghz (We use only 1 radio 1SS)
USB turn off
2nd Ethernet disabled.
Am i correct?
Just a few thoughts 1) I agree that 5 GHz is becoming very widespread 2) However, 2.4 ...
Just a few thoughts
1) I agree that 5 GHz is becoming very widespread
2) However, 2.4 still needs to be treated appropriately
- Number of client drivers still do not behave well with band steering and do not necessarily select 5 GHz
- 2.4 should be deployed with the power set 5- 8 dB less than 5 GHz radio in the same chassis
- the extra chains make the link more robust due to diversity benefits
- If you get a DFS event the 2.4 needs to be properly tuned to preseve your customer experience.
- 2.4 should generally be left on to ensure anyone connected to 2.4 is on the nearest AP and getting a decent user experience
- Turn off your b rates and even a couple of the low gn rates. This reduces the beacon time consumption and improves 2.4 performance.
So even if the 2.4 band performance is less than 5 GHz it is still 60 MHz of spectrum that you have access to and, deployed properly, adds value to your end customers.
If PoE is a constraint, then as someone mentioned AP-215 is a great option outside of higher density areas.