A customer of ours has asked us about the protocols behind Instant APs and their virtual controller technology.
I guess it works more or less like VRRP with no preemption and the same priority for all APs for the master AP election. For control traffic, i suppose it still uses PAPI tunnels but I would like to give our customer a more precise answer. Are there any tecnhnical notes addressing virtual controller technology?
P.S. I've already seen the tech notes on the main webpage, but I'm afraid I need a bit more detail.
The virtual controller or master is elected using an election process that involves all IAPs in the group. If there is a contention, the IAP with the highest uptime will win.
There are no tunnels built for control traffic. The IAPs communicate using layer 2 broadcast and this is very lightweight.
There are additional details that can't be shared externally, but if there are specific questions or issues that the customer is concerned about, I will be happy to discuss those.
We've been capturing traffic in one of our customers network and have found out the following:
So the IAP works like the APs with the controller with bridge mode right?
At Aruba, we believe that the most dynamic customer experiences happen at the Edge. Our mission is to deliver innovative solutions that harness data at the Edge to drive powerful business outcomes.
© Copyright 2020 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LPAll Rights Reserved.