Wireless Access

 View Only
  • 1.  AOS10: 802.1x PEAP on uplink with Windows NPS not working

    Posted Feb 13, 2025 08:22 AM

    Hi All.

    I'm trying to secure our network further by enabling 802.1x on all switchports using PEAP-Chapv2. Backend Server is Windows Server 2019 NPS

    All clients can authenticate to port with their username/password as expected.

    I'm now trying to get my AP's to authenticate using PEAP as well for easier deployment, but that does not work. On the NPS server I hit the correct policy, but the request is rejected with the error: 

    Reason Code: 269
    Reason: The client and server cannot communicate, because they do not possess a common algorithm.

    That seems to suggest the AP is trying to use TLS 1.0 or 1.1 which is disabled (i think) on Server 2019 NPS. The NPS uses TLS 1.2 as far as I know. 

    Any ideas?

    -Keyser



  • 2.  RE: AOS10: 802.1x PEAP on uplink with Windows NPS not working

    Posted Feb 13, 2025 09:55 AM

    Grab a packet capture of the transaction to see what TLS version is presented in the Client Hello.  If necessary to change, you can then make a registry edit to enable the require TLS version.



    ------------------------------
    Carson Hulcher, ACEX#110
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: AOS10: 802.1x PEAP on uplink with Windows NPS not working

    Posted Feb 13, 2025 10:10 AM

    I haven't tried that yet as I would need some extra setup and time to accomplish that. 
    I guessed that lots of other users have already tried doing Uplink PEAP 802.1x auth against Windows NPS and could share the solution to the problem :-)




  • 4.  RE: AOS10: 802.1x PEAP on uplink with Windows NPS not working

    Posted Feb 14, 2025 05:27 AM

    Hi,

    I think I blogged about this issue a few years ago:

    Problems authenticating Aruba access points using PEAP (ap1x) and NPS on Windows Server 2019




  • 5.  RE: AOS10: 802.1x PEAP on uplink with Windows NPS not working

    Posted Feb 14, 2025 08:51 AM

    I can confirm that your findings also worked in my case. Thank you very much :-)