I don't know what happened when I replied to your comment, it's indeed 71/79 and 69. I probably wanted to ask if it shouldn't be 72, but as you say that's correct then that must not be it. (The source (that actually displays the actually correct number) is a capture made by a Mac using the built-in Wireless Diagnostics capture functionality. Displayed by Wireshark.)
I'll keep digging, this does now sound like an Intel FW + Linux bug. As I understand the BugZilla report, the code that throws that warning was added to avoid a firmware problem. So this indeed now sounds like an Intel bug. I'll see if I can try other firmware versions.
Thanks again for your expertise.
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 09, 2025 10:58 AM
From: schmelzle
Subject: AP-655 6GHz / 6E incompatibility with Intel AX210
I just booted up an AP-655 on 8.12.0.4 and see CCFS0 as 71 and CCFS1 as 79 which is correct based on the specification for 160 MHz at 69 in 6 GHz. What is the source showing CCFS0 as 72? Some Linux utility or is this in an OTA capture? Please verify this in OTA capture and if you see 72, please open a case and attach the pcap/tech support.
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 09, 2025 09:42 AM
From: Avamander
Subject: AP-655 6GHz / 6E incompatibility with Intel AX210
Okay, I've also made a packet capture and the HE CCFS0 is 72, CFFS1 is 79 in the beacon frame. Primary channel is 69.
CCFS0 does look odd, shouldn't that be 71? Then 79 would be okay?
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 09, 2025 09:23 AM
From: Avamander
Subject: AP-655 6GHz / 6E incompatibility with Intel AX210
The kernel is currently 6.11.0, but trying slightly older kernels changed nothing. I haven't tried replacing Intel firmware because it doesn't seem to be a firmware crash or error.
Looking around there's one other mention of this message on kernel's BugZilla (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219159). The summary of that seems to be that the AP is picking an invalid channel? If I'm reading it correctly the failure condition is `!he_6ghz_oper->ccfs1`, which would mean that it fails because CCFS1 is not set properly. In any case it sounds like the very least, the kernel is stricter about non-conformant behaviour (and there are commit messages about that).
> Management frames still use OFDM rates so disabling those will not help.
I'd still like to try and disable all the 802.11b rates, if it's possible.
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 08, 2025 04:33 PM
From: schmelzle
Subject: AP-655 6GHz / 6E incompatibility with Intel AX210
Management frames still use OFDM rates so disabling those will not help. Have you tried different firmware and Linux kernel versions for the AX210? What ucode and kernel are you currently using?
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 05, 2025 07:56 PM
From: Avamander
Subject: AP-655 6GHz / 6E incompatibility with Intel AX210
I've been trying to get AP-655 working with AX210 clients on the 6GHz band. Both Windows and Linux clients on Intel chipsets seem to just refuse to connect.
Linux clients seem to complain about some kind of mode change:
wlp4s0: bad HE/EHT 6 GHz operation
wlp4s0: AP appears to change mode (expected HE, found legacy), disconnect
These 6GHz SSID do however work with MacOS and they're legal to use (have been allowed for a while now). Though at a subpar performance, I have a few 802.11ac access points that achieve better latency and jitter on 5GHz, and speeds at the same bandwidth/stream count. But this performance is probably a separate issue and there are a few other threads about this. (Disappointing nevertheless.)
I can't seem to find any configuration option for disabling legacy operations (I guess anything below 802.11n?) for ArubaOS 8.12.0.4. I did try to change a/g mininum and allowed rates, but those seem to have had no effect. (I still see those legacy rates listed in iw scan
output.)
Is this a known issue? Can I somehow disable a/b/g operations to try and see if this improves things?