Except here, we're making constructive use of FSPL, rather than trying to engineer around it.the following is an excerpt from my blog post on beacon placement:
Determining distance based on triangulation of beacon RSSI is optimal within about 0-4 metres due to the inverse square law of RF propagation. Typically, the calibrated output of the beacons is 0dBm (1mW). They operate in the 2.4GHz band on a 2MHz advertisement channel tucked between Wi-Fi channels 1 and 6, as well as one just past channel 11, and another one just below channel 1.There's also some variability between receiver devices in terms of their sensitivity and even based on internal antenna configuration and how the device is held/oriented, so let's just assume it's +/- 3dB for the purposes of this example because it makes the math simpler.
When the receiving device sees a BLE beacon, it then determines its distance from that beacon based on the RSSI (and uses the beacon's ID to correlate it with the device's placement on the map). When it sees a beacon at -35dBm, it knows it's under a metre away. If it sees it at -55dBm, that could be anywhere between 4 and 8 metres away. So the farther you get from the beacon, the wider that margin of error becomes. Any walls that get between can also add 3dB or more of attenuation depending on the materials used. (just like they do with Wi-Fi, since we're dealing with the same RF frequencies, just at about 1/1000 the power).
Below 1 metre, every time you halve the distance you gain 6dB – so 50cm would be -34dB, 25cm would be -28dB, 12.5cm would be -22dB, and now we're getting really close to the beacon, and it's already lost 99% of the transmitted power. And if you're using an AP as a beacon, don't forget that at typical ceiling height, even standing directly under it, you're already 2.5 metres away.
© Copyright 2023 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LPAll Rights Reserved.