Hi,
I'm using a IAP325 with code 4.2.2.0. I currenlty have the VC up and running and have several clients connected to it. When I connect a second AP (factory default) to the same switch in the same VLAN, it receives an IP-address and it is pingable from my client.
When looking at the VC web interface, the seocnd AP sometimes appears in the AP list but most of the time it is not being seen. Also when trying to connect to this AP it won't let clients connect to it.
Once I disconnect the VC from the network, my client gets diconnected but after several seconds connect to the second AP (which than has become VC).
So the second AP receives the VC configuration, however they are not operating together when they are operational at the same time.
I'm able to setup a telnet session to the AP, but not able to authenticaite. I don't see any attempts hitting the authentication server. This might indicate that the request stops at the VC, or probably does not reach the VC at all.
When checking the log file on the VC when the second AP is operational, I see the following messages:
Jan 5 13:39:54 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_0: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:39:54 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:22 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:22 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:27 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:27 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:29 cli[3471]: <341102> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| Incorrect format for message type 0:69521408:223:5:10.32.24.55:8480.
Jan 5 13:44:32 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:32 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:37 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:37 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:42 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:42 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:47 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:47 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:44:52 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check_v1_1: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:44:52 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
Jan 5 13:49:02 stm[3494]: <304065> <ERRS> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 stm| PAPI_Send failed, send_papi_message_with_args, 880: No such file or directory, dstport 5664
Jan 5 13:49:25 cli[3471]: <341097> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| recv_image_check: mac-ac:a3:1e:cd:35:76, version-6.4.4.3-4.2.2.0_53034, ccode_idx-255.
Jan 5 13:49:25 cli[3471]: <341165> <WARN> |AP ac:a3:1e:cd:46:7e@10.32.24.84 cli| send image match to 10.32.24.55.
When disabling the auto-join feature on the VC, I do see the mac-address in 'red' with status 'This AP is not connected'. Therefore it doesn't seem to be related to the PAPI protocol.
I've checked the forum but cannot find a similar issue. Anyone familiar with this?