Wireless Access

Hi, 

I tried to search for this but I couldn't find any documentation on how these methods compare to each other:

WEBCC on Instant vs WebCC on AOS8 vs WEBCC on AOS10 AP with Central vs WEBCC on AOS10 gateway?

My questions are:
Is there any noticeable difference (from user perspective) in the 4 methods?
Apart from the webCC on AOS8, does the other methods need any special license?
Where do they cache the webcc URLs (if they cache it)?
Are there any limitations(client number, URL cache max object size?) on any of these methods? (Example: VMC-s and Virtual Gateways were not scaled by engineering correctly, so regardless of size when issuing the #show gsm debug channel web_cc_info status the "Max number of Objects = 33768". So Virtual appliances have a built in limitation of maximum 33768 URL cache which is not enough for large scale deployment. On the other hand 7220 has a 527288 object size)

Thank you in advance!

Cs

• In Aruba Instant there is no additional subcription needed.
• In Aruba AOS8 you need a per AP Web-CC subcription for 1,3,5,7 or 10 year
• In Aruba AOS10 there is no additional subcription required and Web-CC is part of the AP Foundation subcription.

In Aruba Instant AOS8 you create a virtual cluster where on AP is the Master, which is limited.

In Aruba AOS10 all APs are dedicated and work on its own (there is no virtual controller anymore), management is done by Aruba Central. 

Hi, 

I tried to search for this but I couldn't find any documentation on how these methods compare to each other:

WEBCC on Instant vs WebCC on AOS8 vs WEBCC on AOS10 AP with Central vs WEBCC on AOS10 gateway?

My questions are:
Is there any noticeable difference (from user perspective) in the 4 methods?
Apart from the webCC on AOS8, does the other methods need any special license?
Where do they cache the webcc URLs (if they cache it)?
Are there any limitations(client number, URL cache max object size?) on any of these methods? (Example: VMC-s and Virtual Gateways were not scaled by engineering correctly, so regardless of size when issuing the #show gsm debug channel web_cc_info status the "Max number of Objects = 33768". So Virtual appliances have a built in limitation of maximum 33768 URL cache which is not enough for large scale deployment. On the other hand 7220 has a 527288 object size)

Thank you in advance!

Cs

Hi,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

Yes the main architectural differences are clear for us. We are curious about the deep details. For example is there any main difference about the operation or is there any configuration what we can do if we use controller but we cant if we use aos10 with central. Last but not at least the most important technical question about the object size because we face with this limitation with VMC and we have to know we wont face with this limitation on other Aruba architecture eg. AOS10+Central.

Cs

• In Aruba Instant there is no additional subcription needed.
• In Aruba AOS8 you need a per AP Web-CC subcription for 1,3,5,7 or 10 year
• In Aruba AOS10 there is no additional subcription required and Web-CC is part of the AP Foundation subcription.

In Aruba Instant AOS8 you create a virtual cluster where on AP is the Master, which is limited.

In Aruba AOS10 all APs are dedicated and work on its own (there is no virtual controller anymore), management is done by Aruba Central. 

Hi, 

I tried to search for this but I couldn't find any documentation on how these methods compare to each other:

WEBCC on Instant vs WebCC on AOS8 vs WEBCC on AOS10 AP with Central vs WEBCC on AOS10 gateway?

My questions are:
Is there any noticeable difference (from user perspective) in the 4 methods?
Apart from the webCC on AOS8, does the other methods need any special license?
Where do they cache the webcc URLs (if they cache it)?
Are there any limitations(client number, URL cache max object size?) on any of these methods? (Example: VMC-s and Virtual Gateways were not scaled by engineering correctly, so regardless of size when issuing the #show gsm debug channel web_cc_info status the "Max number of Objects = 33768". So Virtual appliances have a built in limitation of maximum 33768 URL cache which is not enough for large scale deployment. On the other hand 7220 has a 527288 object size)

Thank you in advance!

Cs

Hi, 

I tried to search for this but I couldn't find any documentation on how these methods compare to each other:

WEBCC on Instant vs WebCC on AOS8 vs WEBCC on AOS10 AP with Central vs WEBCC on AOS10 gateway?

My questions are:
Is there any noticeable difference (from user perspective) in the 4 methods?
Apart from the webCC on AOS8, does the other methods need any special license?
Where do they cache the webcc URLs (if they cache it)?
Are there any limitations(client number, URL cache max object size?) on any of these methods? (Example: VMC-s and Virtual Gateways were not scaled by engineering correctly, so regardless of size when issuing the #show gsm debug channel web_cc_info status the "Max number of Objects = 33768". So Virtual appliances have a built in limitation of maximum 33768 URL cache which is not enough for large scale deployment. On the other hand 7220 has a 527288 object size)

Thank you in advance!

Cs