Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Re: Issues with Mac systems?
11-09-2009 08:02 AM
Not to hijack this thread entirely, but it has come to my attention that Mac clients have been having issues connecting to Aruba 802.11n networks with bonded channels where the beacons are broadcast on the secondary channel instead of the control channel. The bug ID is 36819 and was reportedly fixed in Aruba OS 3.3.2.22. I can't seem to locate the release notes for that build. Additionally, OS X 10.5.8 includes some driver fixes for their 2008 and 2009 Broadcom chipsets that seem to alleviate connection issues. Authentication has never seemed to be much of an issue so I wouldn't look to weaken that, if possible.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Alert a Moderator
MAC and Aruba
11-12-2009 03:20 PM
It is a 2 sided equation:
RISD (an Art School with 65%+ Mac) had a huge problem with Mac's connecting.
Mac's made a few major revisions in their code and Aruba made some changes in the 3.x.x.18 code.
The latest code from Apple has some changes too. Most of our problems (dropping etc) were resovled with the Aruba mods and Apple's changes.
Mac 10.3 wont work
Mac 10.4.11 is pretty good.
10.5 is very good.
Ian Lyons
RISD (an Art School with 65%+ Mac) had a huge problem with Mac's connecting.
Mac's made a few major revisions in their code and Aruba made some changes in the 3.x.x.18 code.
The latest code from Apple has some changes too. Most of our problems (dropping etc) were resovled with the Aruba mods and Apple's changes.
Mac 10.3 wont work
Mac 10.4.11 is pretty good.
10.5 is very good.
Ian Lyons
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Alert a Moderator
Highlighted
MAC and Aruba
11-13-2009 08:00 AM
Hi Ian,
Thanks for sharing your experiences. Can you provide specific AOS as
3.x.x could be 3.1.x.x, 3.2.x.x, or 3.3.x.x. But I would infer that you
are referring to 3.3.2.18.
Regards,
-michael
Thanks for sharing your experiences. Can you provide specific AOS as
3.x.x could be 3.1.x.x, 3.2.x.x, or 3.3.x.x. But I would infer that you
are referring to 3.3.2.18.
Regards,
-michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Alert a Moderator
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »