Security

last person joined: yesterday 

Forum to discuss Enterprise security using HPE Aruba Networking NAC solutions (ClearPass), Introspect, VIA, 360 Security Exchange, Extensions, and Policy Enforcement Firewall (PEF).

CPPM 6.7 and Palo Alto userid integration - idle timeout setting

This thread has been viewed 4 times
  • 1.  CPPM 6.7 and Palo Alto userid integration - idle timeout setting

    Posted Jul 18, 2018 11:20 AM

    Dear all,

     

    refering following related discussion,

     

    https://community.arubanetworks.com/t5/Security/Clearpass-Palo-Alto-integration-pan-OS-7-1-5-xmlapi-user-timeout/td-p/278098

     

    http://community.arubanetworks.com/t5/Wireless-Access/Palo-Alto-integration-ClearPass-vs-controller/td-p/311933

    i invesitgated about an XMLAPI user timeout setting issue.

    My environment is composed of PANOS 7.1.18 and CPPM 6.7.4.

     

    The issue was the same; idle timeout for injected users from ClearPass (XMLAPI) inherits default PAN user-id value (45 min) due to missing XML "timeout" parameter from Clearpass.

     

    That is confirmed reviewing default content for PAN Endpoint Context Server Actions "Send Login Info" on my CPPM:

     default-action.jpg

    "timeout" parameter misses.

     

    I solved modifying content as following:

     

    <uid-message><version>1.0</version><type>update</type><payload><login><entry name="%{user}" ip="%{ip}" timeout="0"/></login></payload></uid-message>

     

    I added timeout="0", to get "never" expiration.

     

    My question is, why timeout misses in the predefined content action?

    Based on the posts above mentioned, I would have expected this to be implemented by default in 6.7 version...

     

    Another question, I found following parameter under Administration->Server Configuration->Server Parameters->Async Network Service:

    immagine.png

    Is this related to topic in object?

    I suppose yes, in my opinion this could be the default timeout injected from CPPM to PAN with post authentication action, but as discussed it doesn't apply/work.

     

    thanks

    Andrea