10-03-2019 05:32 AM
USING CLI: copy tftp://10.10.10.10/Customized-aoscx-8320-config.txt running-config
One question at the end of this POST.
My reproducible Steps:
1. Booted my 8320.
2. Saved my running config to TFTP server as "Customized-aoscx-8320-config.txt".
3. Added vlans 1100-3000
4. Did NOT save the running config to the startup config.
5. RECOVERED the running config with the following command: copy tftp://10.10.10.10/Customized-aoscx-8320-config.txt running-config
6. Viewed event log via: how events -d hpe-config , to see several errors similar to the following for ALL my VLANs:
2019-10-03T05:09:35.538945-05:00 AOSCX8320-16070 hpe-config: Event|6802|LOG_ERR|AMM|-|Error while copying configs. Error: Command failed: name VLAN-140, Response:VLAN name VLAN-140 is already used for VLAN 140.
7. The running config was updated BUT VLAN 1100-3000 (see step #3, above) were NOT deleted.
When using a command similar to "copy tftp://10.10.10.10/Customized-aoscx-8320-config.txt running-config" should the entire existing aos-cx-8320 running config be replaced/erased or is aos-cx 10.03 designed to replace ONLY portions of the running config???
** Don't get "hung-up on the vlan example above. I also had portions of the original access-lists retained during other tftp testing.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-03-2019 09:14 AM
It is never a good idea to copy to running configuration..
it is always better to copy to startup and restart the switch
Also it is DB-driven switch, you can also use checkpoint
PowerArubaSW: Powershell Module to use Aruba Switch API for Vlan, VlanPorts, LACP, LLDP... More info
PowerArubaCP: Powershell Module to use ClearPass API (create NAD, Guest...) More info
PowerArubaCX: Powershell Module to use ArubaCX API (get interface/vlan/ports info)
PowerArubaIAP: Powershell Module to use Aruba Instant AP
PowerArubaMC: Powershell Module to use Mobility Controller / Master
ACMP 6.4 / ACMX #107 / ACCP 6.5 / ACSP
Re: AOS-CX 10.03+ << copy TFTP running-config (??? running replaced or updated ???)
10-03-2019 03:34 PM
Hi, as @alagoutte wrote you above checkpoint is the way to go when moving between configuration states (especially when you want a consistent rollback mechanism), here an introduction.