Wired Intelligent Edge

last person joined: 2 days ago 

Bring performance and reliability to your network with the HPE Aruba Networking Core, Aggregation, and Access layer switches. Discuss the latest features and functionality of your switching devices, and find ways to improve security across your network to bring together a mobile-first solution
Expand all | Collapse all

dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF

This thread has been viewed 10 times
  • 1.  dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF

    Posted Jul 08, 2019 11:07 AM

    Hi, I have 2 Aruba 2930F switches, configured as VSF (Switch 1 Commander, Switch 2 Standby).
    I want to configure dynamic LACP trunk groups distributed between both. For example, a dynamic LACP trunk group of 4 physical ports formed by ports 1 and 2 in switch 1 and ports 1 and 2 in switch 2.
    Is it possible to do this? Could someone tell me how?

     

    This is my current configuration and list of ports:

    hostname "Core-HV-Commander"
    vsf
    enable domain 9000
    member 1
    type "JL259A" mac-address 9cdc71-37da40
    priority 255
    link 1 1/23
    link 1 name "I-Link1_1"
    link 2 1/24
    link 2 name "I-Link1_2"
    exit
    member 2
    type "JL259A" mac-address 9cdc71-362fe0
    priority 128
    link 1 2/23
    link 1 name "I-Link2_1"
    link 2 2/24
    link 2 name "I-Link2_2"
    exit
    port-speed 1g
    exit
    aruba-central disable
    include-credentials
    password manager user-name "manager" sha1
    "6f2f6aad0e3d08acaa56fcae9ead3eb7ad259ed6"
    time timezone -3
    snmp-server community "public" unrestricted
    snmpv3 engineid "00:00:00:0b:00:00:9c:dc:71:37:da:43"
    vlan 1
    name "DEFAULT_VLAN"
    untagged 1/1-1/22,1/25-1/28,2/1-2/22,2/25-2/28
    ip address 10.250.250.16 255.255.255.0
    exit
    no tftp server
    no autorun
    no dhcp config-file-update
    no dhcp image-file-update


    Flow Bcast
    Port Total Bytes Total Frames Errors Rx Drops Tx Ctrl Limit
    ------------ -------------- -------------- --------- --------- ---- -----
    1/1 8,448,200 8285 0 0 off 0
    1/2 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/3 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/4 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/5 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/6 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/7 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/8 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/9 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/10 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/11 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/12 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/13 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/14 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/15 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/16 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/17 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/18 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/19 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/20 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/21 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/22 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/23 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/24 2,197,780,855 167,829,705 0 0 off 0
    1/25 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/26 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/27 0 0 0 0 off 0
    1/28 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/1 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/2 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/3 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/4 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/5 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/6 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/7 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/8 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/9 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/10 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/11 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/12 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/13 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/14 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/15 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/16 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/17 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/18 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/19 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/20 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/21 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/22 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/23 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/24 2,211,441,065 168,042,248 0 0 off 0
    2/25 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/26 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/27 0 0 0 0 off 0
    2/28 0 0 0 0 off 0

     

    Thanks in advance

    Gabriel



  • 2.  RE: dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF

    MVP GURU
    Posted Jul 08, 2019 05:57 PM
    Cheers, what's the purpose of using Dynamic LACP versus Static LACP Port Trunking?

    Pay attention to restrictions related to using Dynamic LACP (e.g. VLAN 1 untagged, becoming untagged member of other - non default - VLAN requires GVRP) versus Static LACP.

    Anyway...if you really want to go down the Dynamic LACP route...commands below should suffice:

    interface 1/1 lacp active
    interface 1/2 lacp active
    interface 2/1 lacp active
    interface 2/2 lacp active

    If instead you reconsider Static LACP and want to deploy it...use:

    trunk 1/1,1/2,2/1,2/2 trkX lacp

    where X is the (free) logical trunk port number to assign within your VSF. Then you can, if needed, change trkX untagged VLAN membership with a simple command inside the vlan Y context: trkX untagged (and trkX will become untagged member of VLAN Y).


  • 3.  RE: dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF

    Posted Jul 10, 2019 09:55 AM

    Thanks @parnassus for response.

    In my case I don't use VLANS. At the other end I have Hyper-V Server 2016 servers with NIC Teamings already configured as LACP Dynamic.
    I noticed that it is necessary also after the configuration you mention, to specify the operational key to form the groups.
    I add this information for future references:

    # interface 1/1 lacp key 100
    # interface 1/2 lacp key 100
    # interface 2/1 lacp key 100
    # interface 2/2 lacp key 100


    The key value ranges from 0 to 65535.

     

    Thanks again.

    Gabriel



  • 4.  RE: dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF

    MVP GURU
    Posted Jul 10, 2019 11:12 AM
    Personally, I setup few dozens of Static LACP Port Trunks (HP, HPE and Aruba) mainly used to form uplinks to Switches and Servers and never - repeat: never - it was necessary or required to manually change or assign Port Group Operational Key (even if that can be managed)...simply because the trunk command used to setup Ststic LACP trunks takes care about that...so my suggestion is still to give it a try and avoid Dynamic LACP if there isn't a valid reason to stick with it.


  • 5.  RE: dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF

    Posted Jul 10, 2019 01:27 PM

    Ok, maybe I didn't see the operational key when I ran show lacp because I hadn't connected the ports yet. After connected they would have been assigned automatically. Or maybe by assigning them manually it shows them to me even when the ports are disconnected.
    Regarding static trunk, I haven't used it before, because I understand that it is more prone to failures.
    I could test them as well, configuring my NIC Teamings in static LACP and configuring my switches as you mentioned: trunk 1/1,1/2,2/1,2/2 trkX lacp
    Do you think this would be enough?
    Thank you very much
    Gabriel



  • 6.  RE: dynamic LACP trunk group on a VSF
    Best Answer

    MVP GURU
    Posted Jul 10, 2019 02:50 PM

    @neok wrote: Regarding static trunk, I haven't used it before, because I understand that it is more prone to failures.

    Hi Gabriel, could you explain me what are pros/cons of using Dynamic LACP versus Static LACP (considering Dynamic/Static LACP as implemented on ArubaOS-Switch or HP ProVision NOS)?

     

    Generally I see peers (Vendors) supporting simply LACP IEEE 802.3ad and the additional term Dynamic paired with LACP just means LACP as opposed to referring to Static (NON LACP...so without a Protocol)...but the fact that a vendor uses the Dynamic term this doesn't actually mean that it should be paired with an (Aruba/HP) Dynamic LACP implementation...at least this is my opinion.


    @neok wrote:

    Do you think this would be enough?


    Yes, I think.