Wireless Access

last person joined: yesterday 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

AP-105 behind Checkpoint vpn appliance

This thread has been viewed 1 times
  • 1.  AP-105 behind Checkpoint vpn appliance

    Posted Apr 16, 2013 10:32 AM

    Hi,

     

    we're having issues trying to enable an AP-105 in a Checkpoint (CP) vpn configuration.  Config :

     

    AP-105 <-> CP vpn appliance remote site <-> CP vpn firewall HeadQuarters <-> Aruba cntrl

     

    The AP comes up (it's been originally provisioned at HQ).  But when it tries to open an encrypted tunnel to the controller, that's it.  We never see it in the controllers list.  In the logs we see :

     

    Apr 16 15:06:23sapd[579]: <311020> <ERRS> |AP AP-BE-DI-TEST1@192.168.61.10 sapd| An internal system error has occurred at file sapd_redun.c function sapd_proc_redun_msg line 4314 error Error: Received RC_OPCODE_ERROR lms 192.168.101.251 tunnel 0.0.0.0 RC_ERROR_RETRYIKEV1.

     

    We believe this is because the CP vpn actually forwards the encrypted packet on UDP port 4500, unencrypted.  That basically is what is defined in the CP STAR network settings.  So basically the packet gets redirected, as it is unencrypted, to the internet.  And never reaches the Aruba controller.

     

    Is there some way to change that port?  We can't change it on the CP configuration.  Any other solution?



  • 2.  RE: AP-105 behind Checkpoint vpn appliance

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Apr 16, 2013 10:51 AM

    Hold on.

     

    The CP devices are just providing site to site VPN service, right?  So the subnet with the AP is pretty much just another routed subnet within your environment?

     



  • 3.  RE: AP-105 behind Checkpoint vpn appliance

    Posted Apr 16, 2013 02:16 PM

    We've had no trouble passing the standard GRE tunnel through our (Cisco) VPN. We did have to specifically include the GRE and UDP 8211 traffic in our ACL of "interesting" traffic.

     

    I would expect using AP to Controller VPN inside your Checkpoint to Checkpoint VPN to work badly.

     

    Is the remote site not a trunsted site?
     (Or am I totally confused?)



  • 4.  RE: AP-105 behind Checkpoint vpn appliance

    Posted Apr 17, 2013 08:44 AM

    Yes, the 'remote' subnet is a different vlan.  But i have no problem accessing anything else in that subnet.  Has been working perfectly for years.  So it's not a routing issue.  Interesting is we also tried a commbox, and this one does not exhibit the issue.