We currently have 2 x 7210 controllers sat in our main office supplying a VPN service with VIA. Of course the biggest restriction is the Internet for the site; not the controllers in terms of speed users are getting.
Looking at utilising a new controller in our other office that has a unused Internet link. Which of the following do you think would be best:
Option A
Take one of the controllers offline from the main office; give it some new IP addresses and routes, then update the external DNS to reflect the new IP address. Feels a little bit cow boyish … it’s going to have to have new public IP and local IPs at least. Just feels like a risky change?
Option B
We have a spare 7210 controller; install this from scratch at our other site; set up as a new controller within this solution and simply add to the profile as another server to use in the existing profiles? My only concern here is forcing everyone to download a new profile?
Thinking of a way to have the same service split across 2 geographically separate sites, but in a safe way where the users barely notice the change.
Luckily (I think), we don’t have these controllers setup in a VRRP type setup; the VIA client see’s them as 2 separate servers. Each controller has its own profile which points to itself and server number 2 is the other controller ... and vice versa - hope that makes sense.
If you suddenly changed / added to this, would everyone be forced to download a new profile? Which option do you think is best / safest / least impactful?