Wireless Access

Reply
Occasional Contributor I

Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

hello

 

we do have two aruba 7205 controllers with NO master controller

i'm trying to figure out the best way to deploy them to  acheive redundancy

i read that i can just configure them as standlaone and configure VRRP between them and the APs should just terminate to the VRRP IP ?

 

my question : if i did the above then i'll need to configure double the license one on each controller per AP ?

if the above is true then that's not applicable since we do have100 APs and 100 Licenses only

 

what i'm trying to achieve is

-one controller will serve all aps and user traffic, the other is standy

-if active controller fails aps should termiante on the stadnby one and continue working as normal

-we dont need to add more licneses per controller only 100 license per 100 aps

 

what would  be the optimal redundancy soultion for that setup without mobility master

 

i came across the master controller local design but most of it refering to version 6.x

i'm not sure if that fits on the arubaos8 or not since i'm new to aruba and only deployed standalone deployments

 

looking for clarifications

 

thanks in advance

 

Guru Elite

Re: Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

If you do not have an MM, your redundancy options in 8.x are virtually identical to those in 6.x (licensing, standby controller, vrrp, etc).


*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.4 User Guide
InstantOS 8.3 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos
Aruba Central Documentation
Sign up for Security Alerts
Aruba Technical Webinars
Occasional Contributor I

Re: Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

thanks cjoseph

 

so based on teh available option in this regard, what do you recommend that would be best based on our scenario here ?

Guru Elite

Re: Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

You can configure master redundancy between two controllers and point your access point at the VRRP.  Centralized licensing is enabled automatically.

 

 


*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.4 User Guide
InstantOS 8.3 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos
Aruba Central Documentation
Sign up for Security Alerts
Aruba Technical Webinars
MVP Guru

Re: Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

There's a few options you have here, in short here is the following :

 

If using Master/Local or Master/Master you can enable Centralized Licensing to share the same pool of licenses between two controllers. 

 

You can still use MCM/Standalone mode with AOS8. If you go for Master/Local and you lose the Master, you will need to replace/configure a new master before further changes can be implemented.


If you go for a Master/Master deployment you can still make changes to the environment in the event of a controller failure.

 

Take a look at the Campus Redundancy VRD, this explains all the options in more depth. It is written for AOS6 but the concepts still apply to AOS8 in MCM/Standalone mode.

 

https://community.arubanetworks.com/t5/Validated-Reference-Design/Campus-Redundancy-Model/ta-p/510228

 


ACMP, ACSA, ACDX #985
If my post addresses your query, give kudos:)
Highlighted
Frequent Contributor II

Re: Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

Just to add to and highlight some of what has been stated.

 

With 2 controllers, you can create a standalone, and then set up the other standalone as it's VRRP backup. You can have APs point to the VIP, and the APs will terminate on the primary controller. If the primary controller fails, the APs will terminate to the secondary controller, which will have become the primary. The VRRP failover is 3 heartbeats, and the AP PAPI failover is 8 heartbeats. Heartbeats are 1 second. Clients will disconnect and have to reconnect, and firewall states are not preserved. I refer to this as AP preservation, not client preservation.

 

Instead of doing a standalone configuration, you can set up one controllers as a Master Controller Mode (MCM) Master controller. You can then set up one (or more if you had more) controllers as Mobility Controllers (MCs). APs can only terminat to MCs. The Master controller is "ONLY" a management device. So with 2 controllers, one as the Master and the other as an MC, you would not have any failover for the APs, since as I just stated, APs cannot terminate to the Master controller.

 

If you did add an additional controller to the MCM configuration, you would then have the Master controller, and 2 MCs. At this point, you could set up VRRP between the 2 MCs, LMS-IP and Backup LMS-IP, or High Availability (HA). All three of these will provide redundancy. How quickly the failover occurs varies between the 3 solutions, however clients most likely will be disconnected and firewall states will not be preserved. Again, each of these will do AP preservation, not really client preservation.

 

If you want client preservation, where the client continues and firewall state is preserved, then you need to run a Mobility Master (MM).

 

I hope this helps,

 

David
Sr. Trainer and Author of upcoming "Understanding ArubaOS: Version 8.x" book
Occasional Contributor I

Re: Arubaos8 two controllers redundancy scenario

thanks guys for your feedback

 

so jusst to be on the same page i believe for my setup i'll go with installing to standalone controllers and configure VRRP between them

 

as stated above centralized licensing will work

 

but what about configuration ? will the configuration be sybchronized between the primary standlaone and the backup ?

 

i'm running code 8.4.2

Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: