Wireless Access

last person joined: yesterday 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

CSMA/CA doubt

This thread has been viewed 0 times
  • 1.  CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 11, 2017 03:30 PM

    Hi there,

     

    I am new in the Wireless world and I have a small doubt about the CSMA/CA process. I know all the steps about of hearing if the medium is free, running the backoff algorithm and so forth. My doubt is the following, when a client eventually get access to the medium and transmit its data, do it transmit only one frame, two frames or all the data it has buffered?

     

    Regards,
    Julián



  • 2.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Apr 11, 2017 06:14 PM

    @Ejohnson or @Chuck_Lukaszewski might be able to help



  • 3.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 12, 2017 12:37 PM

    Hi there,

     

    Does anyone know what the standard says about that?

     

    Regards,

    Julián



  • 4.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt



  • 5.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 17, 2017 10:26 AM

    Hi Michael-dc,

     

    I had already read the post you show but it doesn't answer my question. I already read, participated and asked the same question in that post, but the question is still open.

     

    Regards,

    Julián



  • 6.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 20, 2017 11:20 AM

    Hi everyone,

     

    I found this about one of the enhancements of 802.11n:

     

    Block acknowledgment —Normally, 802.11 requires that each frame of data transmitted must be acknowledged by the recipient. If a frame goes unacknowledged, the transmitter can assume that the frame was lost and needs to be resent. The overhead of having acknowledgment messages interleaved with every transmitted frame is inefficient; it uses up airtime on the shared media.
    With 802.11n, data frames can be transmitted in one burst. Only one acknowledgment is expected from the recipient after the burst is complete. More airtime can be spent sending data, increasing the overall throughput.

     

    Therefore I think with the standards prior to 802.11n, the stations sent only one frame when they got the medium. From 802.11n on, this changed and they can transmit more than one frame.

     

    Regards,

    Julián



  • 7.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 20, 2017 05:21 PM

    Its depends, however with WMM enabled clients they will receive an allotted amount of time to send frames.  This is known as transmit opportunity or TXOP. During the TXOP, multiple frames can be sent using Short

    Interframe Spacing SIFS between each packet (protects the medium from others). There are default TXOP limit values for each QoS access category, but they can be changed on the AP.



  • 8.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 20, 2017 05:30 PM

    Hi tritterbush,

     

    I think you are right but when you talked about WMM you are addressing a specific situation. I think with WMM enabled stations will receive an allotted amount of time to send many frames because the applications are delay sensitive. But I am talking if in a general situation a stations can send many frames once it gets the medium. In addition, I think WMM didn't exist prior to 802.11n though I am not sure.

     

    Regards,

    Julián



  • 9.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 20, 2017 09:46 PM

    Wifi Alliance required WMM a subset of 802.11e for 802.11n certification.


    The 802.11 standard says one frame per contention windows, QoS changes the random backoff period which changes the contention window.
    Higher QoS value, lower random backoff, better chance at getting access to the medium.



  • 10.  RE: CSMA/CA doubt

    Posted Apr 21, 2017 10:12 AM

    Hi tritterbush,

     

    Clear, many thanks :)

     

    Best regards,

    Julián