Wireless Access

last person joined: yesterday 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

Controller Vs Instant in a Hotel

This thread has been viewed 2 times
  • 1.  Controller Vs Instant in a Hotel

    Posted Oct 18, 2017 09:26 PM

    Hello All

     

    Under what situation would i use a Controller based solution for a Hotel.

    Typically i use Instant APs regardless of size with various clusters.

    I am just looking for some use cases or ideas where a Controller is a MUST have.

     

    Thanks



  • 2.  RE: Controller Vs Instant in a Hotel
    Best Answer

    Posted Oct 18, 2017 11:37 PM

    Hi,

     

    It depends on model you have and number of APs. You can use IAP in cluster if the model has more efficient (CPU, Memory) to handle.

    For controller, first is performance to handle and easily to view status. Second, guest ticket can be created on the controller and support more than IAP (Internal database). You can do guest on wired also.



  • 3.  RE: Controller Vs Instant in a Hotel
    Best Answer

    Posted Oct 19, 2017 02:43 AM

    My opinion,

     

    For physical controller based deployment, captive portal have more control over captive portal features, management of guest passes, management of policies with regards to ticket validity, device permitted and even policy enforcement rules.
    To achieve better control and accountability on the wireless network

     

     


    Ultimately the add on features of LIC-PEF and LIC-RFP are good to have and not a must have for wireless deployment.



  • 4.  RE: Controller Vs Instant in a Hotel
    Best Answer

    Posted Oct 19, 2017 07:36 PM

    Thank you all for your response.