Wireless Access

Reply

Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

Is Dynamic VLAN supported when Bridge WLAN is implemented?, or does it require tunnel mode?

Guru Elite

Re: Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

Yes.

Tim Cappalli | Aruba Security
@timcappalli | timcappalli.me | ACMX #367 / ACCX #480

Re: Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

Rhanks for your answer. when configuring the WLAN I use any of the VLANs?

Re: Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

Hi,

 

I have an additional question, what VLAN should I use when creating the WLAN?, should it be one of the ones I'm going to use for dynamic assignment or could it be any?

Guru Elite

Re: Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

How do you plan on doing dynamic vlan assignment?


*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.3 User Guide
InstantOS 8.3 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos

Re: Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

Hi,

 

With NPS. I did that config with Filter ID attribute for some Tunnel mode WLAN and it worked, but I'm not sure for Bridge mode WLANs

Guru Elite

Re: Dynamic VLAN with Bridge WLAN

What you should be doing is returning the Aruba-User-Vlan attribute instead of using derivation rules.  It does not matter what the Virtual AP VLAN is, the Aruba-User-Vlan attribute will override it and tag the user traffic and send it out the wired interface of the AP.  The AP sytem profile has a VLAN parameter.  Only bridged traffic whose vlan matches this parameter is untagged.  All of the other traffic with VLANs that differ from that parameter, whether it be the Virtual AP or from the Aruba-User-Vlan attribute will be tagged out the physical interface of the AP.

 

I hope that helps.


*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.3 User Guide
InstantOS 8.3 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos
Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: