Wireless Access

last person joined: yesterday 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

This thread has been viewed 4 times
  • 1.  EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Oct 19, 2017 04:18 PM

     Hi All,

     

    I am going to implement L3 EoGRE Tunnel between our Aruba Controller and cisco SaMOG. The issue is, the tunnel is not going UP. When i run a command "show interface tunnel 1" controller shows me "Tunnel 1 is UP, line protocol is down".

     

    Below are my configuration on controller.

     

    Vlan 490

     

    interface Tunnel 1
      tunnel mode gre 1

      ip address 10.195.13.132 255.255.255.224
      tunnel Keepalive
      tunnel source Vlan 490
      tunnel destination 10.195.64.129

    exit

     

    The above tunnel IP is from VLAN 490.

    Please help me out if i am doing any mistake in configuration.

     



  • 2.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Oct 25, 2017 03:55 AM

    Can you please try to send us the configuration at cisco side?



  • 3.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Oct 25, 2017 06:00 AM

    Thanks for your reply.

     

    CISCO SaMOG is ASR6500 Device. The CISCO device is not under our control and as per cisco team they have no stataic configuration for GRE. This device (SaMOG) create tunnel dynamically mean to say SaMOG create tunnel to any device from which he receive request for GRE tunnel. 



  • 4.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Oct 25, 2017 06:42 AM

    I doubt this information. Can you recheck with them?

     

    Below is from Cisco docmentation for IPoGRE on SaMOG:

         interface  interface_tunnel_name tunnel
              ip vrf forwarding  gre_vrf_name
              ip address  ip_address[/mask ]ipv4/v6_address
              tunnel-mode gre
                   source interface interface_name
                   destination address ipv4_address
                   exit 
              exit 

    Reference:

    https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/asr_5000/20/SaMOG/b_20-SaMOG-Admin/b_20-SaMOG-Admin_chapter_0101.html#reference_5873e7a4-0843-4001-989d-3d2ffe828e68



  • 5.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Oct 25, 2017 06:54 AM

    the tunnel type is configured as "tunnel mode gre 1” and this means this is L2 GRE tunnel. For L3 GRE, this should be “tunnel mode gre ip”

     

    This is a sample config for L3 GRE, between two Aruba controllers.

     

    IPv4 Controller-1 Configuration

    (Controller-1) (config) # interface tunnel 104

    description “IPv4 L3 GRE 104"

    tunnel mode gre ip

    ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255

    tunnel source vlan 10

    tunnel destination 20.20.20.249

    Trusted

     

    IPv4 Controller-2 Configuration

    (Controller-2) (config) # interface tunnel 204

    description “IPv4 L3 GRE 204"

    tunnel mode gre ip

    ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255

    tunnel source vlan 20

    tunnel destination 10.10.10.249

    Trusted



  • 6.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Nov 05, 2017 02:47 AM

    Hello, can you please update us on the status?



  • 7.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Nov 05, 2017 03:33 AM

    Hi,

     

    The issue is still not resolved. Aruba TAC and local system engineer are working with us. We tried both L2 and L3 gre but nothing happened. whenever we disable the keepalive, the tunnel goes up. We are troubleshooting the issue with Cisco.



  • 8.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Nov 05, 2017 04:35 AM

    Can we conifigure or set Protocol Type to 6558 as cisco is WLC is configured?

     

     



  • 9.  RE: EoGRE Tunnel Between Aruba Controller and CISCO SaMOG

    Posted Jun 14, 2018 11:35 AM

    Hello! Have you any update to this question?