Wireless Access

last person joined: yesterday 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

This thread has been viewed 4 times
  • 1.  Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 17, 2019 12:04 PM

    Inter controller seamless roaming(L2 roaming), options we brought up three controllers as, controller1: 7220 as master controller (192.168.241.20) controller2: MD1 7010 as Managed device (192.168.241.21) controller2: MD2 7010 as managed device(192.168.241.22) now in the master controller(7220) able to list MD1 and MD2, provided the IPsec key on the MC and configured Mobility Domain in the MC as, ip mobile domain default hat 192.168.241.21 255.255.255.0 1 10.1.1.245 description “Inter controller" ip mobile domain default hat 192.168.241.22 255.255.255.0 1 10.1.1.245 description “Inter controller" now AP1 is connected to MD1 and AP2 is connected to MD2, now i am trying FT roam between two controllers i.e MD1 and MD2, device is doing everytime full authentication between two controllers and   this is affecting my voice call, please let me know any configuration missing. 



  • 2.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 17, 2019 12:07 PM

    OS version used is 8.3x in all the controllers



  • 3.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Feb 17, 2019 02:04 PM

    Try to use "Preserve Client VLAN" in the Virtual AP profile.  If the two controllers share the same layer 2 network for client VLANs, the second controller will attempt to see if the Client's mac address is in the ARP table and on what VLAN.  If the client's mac address exists, it will attempt to put that device into the same VLAN.



  • 4.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 18, 2019 03:55 AM

     

    thanks for your response..

    still iam observing the issue..

    is cluster configuration required?



  • 5.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Feb 18, 2019 05:59 AM

    Do you have an MM?  If not, you cannot do a cluster configuration.



  • 6.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 18, 2019 06:18 AM

    no i dont have MM, 

    one master controller(7220) and two MD's(7010) are connected to MC, now i have to do the L2 seamless roaming, i need  configuration, 
    please let me know any logs are required i can share with you.



  • 7.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Feb 18, 2019 06:21 AM

    If you don't have an MM, you cannot form a cluster.

    Are the clients using the same layer 2 network on both controllers for that SSID?

    Are you using VLAN pooling?

    What authentication and encryption are you using?

     



  • 8.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 18, 2019 07:34 AM

     

    yes it is using the same L2 network on the both controllers, 

     

    not using the VLAN pooling.

    What authentication and encryption are you using?

     

    802.1x with PEAP-MSCHAPV2 authentication and AES encryption

     

     

     



  • 9.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Feb 18, 2019 09:21 AM
    Does the client keep the same ipaddress?


  • 10.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 19, 2019 12:33 AM

     

    yes client is keeping the same IP address



  • 11.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 19, 2019 06:20 AM

    Without cluster L2 seamless roaming is not possible?

    We don't have MM . We configured on the controller as Master and other 2 controllers are MD1 and MD2.

    We could see both MD's are displaying in Master.

    Configurations made in Master are successfully pushed to both MD's

    Even we didn't see client roams seamlessly.



  • 12.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Feb 19, 2019 06:48 AM

    You might want to try ip mobility, then:  https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_83_Web_Help/content/arubaframestyles/mobility/ip_mobili.htm

     

    I have not personally tried ip mobility  for ArubaOS 8.x, because clustering makes roaming between controllers very easy.  I would say that in the past it has been encouraged to design the network to minimize roaming of clients between controllers, because it makes troubleshooting difficult.



  • 13.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Feb 19, 2019 07:48 AM

    Another thing you can do is enable the "FDB Update on Assoc" in the Virtual AP profile to update the cam tables when a client associates to see if that makes a difference:  https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_83_Web_Help/content/arubaframestyles/virtualaps/conf_vap_prof.htm?Highlight=fdb

     

    Can both of your explain what tests you are running during roaming between controllers that do not work?



  • 14.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 20, 2019 06:28 AM

    We have very basic setup to validate L2 seamless roaming.

    One Master and 2 MD's.Both MD's jobed with Master.The configuration we created in Master is refleclecting in both MD's.

    We have a profile with FT-802.1x configuration.

    Each MD has one AP joined.

    We have connected Client to AP1 which is with MD1. Our client slowly roaming form AP1 to AP2(which is on MD2).

    During roam we are sending reassoc request,But AP2 is not honoring reassoc reuest.So the client is going for Full Authentication ,which is not correct.

    We are expecting as per configured Fast roam (OKC or PMKID or FT)

    As you mentioned clusetring supports in MM .Does the configuration of cluster is s/w based or specific hardware required to use cluster.



  • 15.  RE: Inter controller seamless roaming(L2), options

    Posted Feb 20, 2019 06:40 AM

     

    please find the attached screen shot for our infrastructre

    WhatsApp Image 2019-02-20 at 5.02.30 PM.jpeg