Wireless Access

Reply
Highlighted
Contributor II

exam hall rf configuration

Hello, Could you help with  advice on the rf configuration for an exam hall which will have a maximum 170 users, just simple internet traffic, no high upload/ download traffic. AP in use is 4 X AP 225.

 

Thank you


Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
Guru Elite

Re: exam hall rf configuration

Highlighted
Guru Elite

Re: exam hall rf configuration

Those settings reduce the number of non-overlapping channels and increase decrease rf contention. Not all clients can even do 40 and 80 MHz transfers.

 

EDIT:  more channels and less contention > Wider channels


*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.5 User Guide
InstantOS 8.5 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos
Remote Access Point Solution Guide
ArubaOS Consolidated Release Notes
ArubaOS 8 ViA VPN Solution Guide

View solution in original post


All Replies
Highlighted
Guru Elite

Re: exam hall rf configuration

Highlighted
Contributor II

Re: exam hall rf configuration

Hi, What could be the reason for High Density VRD is recommending toremove 80Mhz & 40 Mhz settings from RF configuration, actually these settings are supposed to increase the throughput and user experience, right ?

Highlighted
Guru Elite

Re: exam hall rf configuration

Those settings reduce the number of non-overlapping channels and increase decrease rf contention. Not all clients can even do 40 and 80 MHz transfers.

 

EDIT:  more channels and less contention > Wider channels


*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.5 User Guide
InstantOS 8.5 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos
Remote Access Point Solution Guide
ArubaOS Consolidated Release Notes
ArubaOS 8 ViA VPN Solution Guide

View solution in original post

Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: