Wireless Access

Reply
MVP

reasons migrating away from PEAP-GTC ?

I have a customer that still uses PEAP-GTC to authenticate.

I adviced them to 'upgrade' to PEAP-MSCHAPv2  but didn't receive immediate approval to do so but rather write a small rapport with the merrits of this change.

 

So my question: what are the arguments for replacing PEAP-GTC with radius?

'Way easier', 'no aditional client' and 'better troubleshooting' are all valid reasons to me but might not convince management that opposes change.

 

So, is there another pressing reason to do this change? Security? Compatibility? Something along those lines?

Koen (ACMX #351 | ACDX #547 | ACCP)

-- Found something helpful, important, or cool? Click the Kudos Star in a post.
-- Problem Solved? Click "Accept as Solution" in a post.
Guru Elite

Re: reasons migrating away from PEAP-GTC ?

No machine authentication and the need to install software on every client. It seems like an easy decision if it is possible.

*Answers and views expressed by me on this forum are my own and not necessarily the position of Aruba Networks or Hewlett Packard Enterprise.*
ArubaOS 8.3 User Guide
InstantOS 8.3 User Guide
Airheads Knowledgebase
Airheads Learning Videos
Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: