Wireless Access

Reply
Occasional Contributor II
Posts: 37
Registered: ‎05-17-2012

AMP and producing a map of clients movement

Hi,

 

I was wondering if anyone out there has carried out the following.

 

I'm trying to produce a map of our campus displaying all movement of connected wireless users from building to building. Whether this is via a heat map or dots. I know AMP will display an overview for a single client on the RF visual for a floor but can it do something across the whole building and campus? The view is to see how busy our campus is and any bottle necks etc.

 

If anyone has worked on creating or producing something along those lines i would be interested to hear your views. We have just over 1700APs covering 60+ buildings, with some outside coverage,

 

Many thanks for your time.

Moderator
Posts: 1,270
Registered: ‎10-16-2008

Re: AMP and producing a map of clients movement

This sounds similar to what the Aruba ALE and Meridian teams are trying to accomplish (you can possibly get more info on that from your Aruba Sales contact in case you want to see about getting a demo).  From the AirWave side, this would be a good feature request to make.


Rob Gin
Senior QA Engineer - Network Services
Aruba Networks, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Occasional Contributor II
Posts: 37
Registered: ‎05-17-2012

Re: AMP and producing a map of clients movement

Thank you for that. We have had Aruba in to discuss Meridian but that was a while ago now, might be worth while having a catch up. 

How would i go forward with a feature request for Airwave? 

 

Thank for your help once again.

Moderator
Posts: 1,270
Registered: ‎10-16-2008

Re: AMP and producing a map of clients movement

From the support.arubanetworks.com website, there's a link to 'Access Feature Requests via Idea Portal'.  If the portal isn't working, you can quickly submit your request through an email to support.


Rob Gin
Senior QA Engineer - Network Services
Aruba Networks, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Search Airheads
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: