Wireless Access

last person joined: 16 hours ago 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

AP225 and AP135

This thread has been viewed 0 times
  • 1.  AP225 and AP135

    Posted Jul 30, 2013 12:47 PM

     

    Is it not recommended to have a mixed deployment of AP225 and AP135 ?



  • 2.  RE: AP225 and AP135
    Best Answer

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Jul 30, 2013 01:25 PM

    This is actually acceptable.

     



  • 3.  RE: AP225 and AP135

    Posted Jul 30, 2013 01:49 PM

     

    Great...Thanks Seth



  • 4.  RE: AP225 and AP135

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Jul 30, 2013 05:40 PM

    Some more info on this...

     

    In some deployments, 802.11ac APs will be rolled out in phases which will require mixing 802.11n and 802.11ac APs. Few things to consider are, as most clients move through the network, they expect to see the same channel width and modulation types in use. Roaming from an 802.11ac 80 MHz channel to an 802.11n 40 MHz or 802.11a 20 MHz channel causes some devices to become “stuck” to the higher speed AP. In some cases, devices disconnect themselves from the network, which requires manual intervention by the user. When you must take a phased approach to 802.11n deployment, Aruba recommends that you completely upgrade one floor or building at a time with new APs. In the case of mixing 11ac with legacy technologies, it is always advisable to set the channel width to the lowest common denominator i.e. fallback to 40 MHz VHT operation when 11ac has to co-exist with 11n and so on. This approach gives devices in that area the best chance of remaining connected to the network and provides a better user experience without any interoperability issues.



  • 5.  RE: AP225 and AP135

    Posted Jul 31, 2013 09:43 AM

     

    Seth thanks for the explanation , it looks like it may not be a good idea to have a "n" and "ac" mixed 



  • 6.  RE: AP225 and AP135

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Jul 31, 2013 09:45 AM
    So long as the channel widths are consistent, there shouldn't be an issue