12-29-2016 01:53 AM
Guys I need to know the main differences between IAP/AP 207 and 205.
As I noticed in the 207, it has a lower price than the 205 knowing that it supports beacons, and has the same specs of the 205 so what could be a valid reason of this?
Also, with the 207 having built-in beacons, does it mean that with the iap 207 in a deployment we now only need battery powered without USB beacons or can we use the aps only with their built-in beacons?
12-29-2016 06:17 AM
I´m adding a question to this thread, I´m interested in seeing the hardware specs difference between these two models. CPU/Memory for example.
Aruba: ACMX #537 ACCP | CWNP: CWNA CWDP CWSP
12-29-2016 09:06 AM
The two main differences are
1. 207 can operate up to 50C vs. 40C on the 205
2. There is a BLE beacon built in.
Yes. You can use the 207 and NOT have to worry about the USB beacons anymore and augment the beacons with the battery powered option.
As for physical size, they are identical.
Consulting Systems Engineer - ACCX, ACDX, ACMX
If you found my post helpful, please give kudos
12-30-2016 12:27 PM
What about the devices density that can connect to the AP
i mean 207 vs 205 which would be recommended for 207 compared to 205?
Product Manager - Aruba Networks