Wireless Access

Reply
Occasional Contributor I
Posts: 5
Registered: ‎01-29-2010

dual supervisor

Hello everyone,

 

i hope this question wouldn't be so dumb...but, what would it be the best way to configure a 6000 controller with dual SC M3??? is there any way to manage both M3 as one, but with doubled capabilities???? what would be desireable is to have both M3's active at the same time, behaving as one and only device, and managed also as one...

 

thank you in advance, and sorry again about the question...

 

UJR

Guru Elite
Posts: 20,811
Registered: ‎03-29-2007

Re: dual supervisor

You would configure those M3s as master/local to achieve that.

 

Please see the Validated Reference Design here:  http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/technology/VRD_Aruba%20Mobility%20Controllers_8.pdf for more details on redundancy.  Search for "master-local".



Colin Joseph
Aruba Customer Engineering

Looking for an Answer? Search the Community Knowledge Base Here: Community Knowledge Base

Occasional Contributor I
Posts: 5
Registered: ‎01-29-2010

Re: dual supervisor

thank you cjoseph...i

 was wondering if it would be some hardware related configuration that would simplify the configuration in terms of  logical interfaces and so on, because of the shared chassis...that is, that they would become one doubled-M3 with only one configuration, or al least, some kind of redundant supervisor awaiting for the failing of the other one...

 

Thank you very much for your help,

 

UJR

Guru Elite
Posts: 20,811
Registered: ‎03-29-2007

Re: dual supervisor

M3 controllers in the Same chassis do not share anything besides a power source.  You have to configure them as master/local for them to share the WLAN/AAA config.  After you configure the master/local relationship, you still have to configure the layer2/layer3 portions of each controller individually.

 



Colin Joseph
Aruba Customer Engineering

Looking for an Answer? Search the Community Knowledge Base Here: Community Knowledge Base

Search Airheads
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: