I've tried that and it's now a chain with no vsf links down. Thanks!
However, I would have thought my config was valid and should allow the introduction of more devices to the stack at a later date. Is there a problem with using 2 VSF links on dual switch stacks?
6300# sh vsf
MAC Address : b8:d4:e7:0b:13:80
Secondary : 2
Topology : Chain
Status : No Split
Split Detection Method : None
Mbr Mac Address type Status
ID
--- ------------------- -------------- ---------------
1 b8:d4:e7:0b:13:80 JL658A Master
2 b8:d4:e7:bd:64:80 JL658A Standby
6300#
6300# sh vsf link
VSF Member 1
Link Peer Peer
Link State Member Link Interfaces
---- ---------- ------- ------ ---------------------------
1 up 2 1 1/1/27-1/1/28
VSF Member 2
Link Peer Peer
Link State Member Link Interfaces
---- ---------- ------- ------ ---------------------------
1 up 1 1 2/1/27-2/1/28
6300#
------------------------------
Stephen Elliott
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 29, 2021 08:36 AM
From: Dustin Burns
Subject: VSF Stacking Error on CX 6300
If its just the two members you should be able to just edit the config to look like this:
vsf member 1 type jl658a link 1 1/1/27-1/1/28vsf member 2 type jl658a link 1 2/1/27-2/1/28
------------------------------
Dustin Burns
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 29, 2021 08:19 AM
From: Stephen Elliott
Subject: VSF Stacking Error on CX 6300
Hi Dustin, sure....
interface 1/1/27 no shutdowninterface 1/1/28 no shutdown....interface 2/1/27 no shutdowninterface 2/1/28 no shutdown......vsf secondary-member 2vsf member 1 type jl658a link 1 1/1/27 link 2 1/1/28vsf member 2 type jl658a link 1 2/1/27 link 2 2/1/286300#
------------------------------
Stephen Elliott
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 29, 2021 07:03 AM
From: Dustin Burns
Subject: VSF Stacking Error on CX 6300
Can you share your VSF configuration, including the interfaces configured for the VSF links.
Thanks!
------------------------------
Dustin Burns
Original Message:
Sent: Apr 29, 2021 06:09 AM
From: Stephen Elliott
Subject: VSF Stacking Error on CX 6300
Hi all!
I have a stack with two CX6300s, one master and one standby, but one of my VSF links will NOT come up at one end so it's in a 'chain'. It's up at the interface level on both 'slots' but I'm seeing an error in the log when I bounce the suspect interface. What's going on here??
Brand new,, out of the box switches and 50G Aruba DACs, AOS 10.04.0010
6300# sh vsf
MAC Address : b8:d4:e7:0b:13:80
Secondary : 2
Topology : Chain
Status : No Split
Split Detection Method : None
Mbr Mac Address type Status
ID
--- ------------------- -------------- ---------------
1 b8:d4:e7:0b:13:80 JL658A Master
2 b8:d4:e7:bd:64:80 JL658A Standby
6300#
6300# sh vsf link
VSF Member 1
Link Peer Peer
Link State Member Link Interfaces
---- ---------- ------- ------ ---------------------------
1 up 2 1 1/1/27
2 up 0 0 1/1/28
VSF Member 2
Link Peer Peer
Link State Member Link Interfaces
---- ---------- ------- ------ ---------------------------
1 up 1 1 2/1/27
2 down 0 0 2/1/28
6300#
6300# sh int br
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port Native Mode Type Enabled Status Reason Speed
VLAN (Mb/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1/27 -- routed SFP56DAC0.65 yes up 50000
1/1/28 -- routed SFP56DAC0.65 yes up 50000
2/1/27 -- routed SFP56DAC0.65 yes up 50000
2/1/28 -- routed SFP56DAC0.65 yes up 50000
6300#
6300# show logg
.......
2021-04-29T10:49:32.827609+00:00 6300 vsfd[4329]: Event|9923|LOG_INFO|STBY|2|VSF link 2 is up
2021-04-29T10:49:33.231893+00:00 6300 vsfd[767]: Event|9923|LOG_INFO|MSTR|1|VSF link 2 is up
2021-04-29T10:49:33.577404+00:00 6300 vsfd[4329]: Event|9906|LOG_WARN|STBY|2|Member 1 conflict detected on link 2
2021-04-29T10:49:34.366394+00:00 6300 vsfd[767]: Event|9906|LOG_WARN|MSTR|1|Member 2 conflict detected on link 2
2021-04-29T10:49:35.577339+00:00 6300 vsfd[4329]: Event|9906|LOG_WARN|STBY|2|Member 1 conflict detected on link 2