Wireless Access

 View Only
last person joined: yesterday 

Access network design for branch, remote, outdoor, and campus locations with HPE Aruba Networking access points and mobility controllers.
Expand all | Collapse all

Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

This thread has been viewed 0 times
  • 1.  Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

    Posted Mar 28, 2014 04:03 AM

    Guys,

     

     

    Recently I had an incident on our company campus layer whereby leases were being consumed by an unidentified device.

     

    The lease was handed out to a very unusual unique identifier.

     

    After googling this I found out the unique device ID was infact a hexidecmial represetation of the actual acknowledged dhcp address in ASCII.  Weird eh?

     

    Put this into excel and do the typical conversions and then I confirmed absolutely, this to be the precicely the case.

     

    I forward all DHCP requests to clearpass for device profiling, I like to know what goes on in our network.

     

    I have cant find any record of these dhcp requests in clearpass.  I was really, really, really, really, disappointed about this.

     

    Anyone know how I can interrogate the endpoint database more vigorously?

     

    Being able to process a DHCP request for a fingerprint (based on a recieved DHCP transactoin and not on a RADIUS message) and send a SNMP action to a switch seems kind of do-able - any one done this and is anyone aware of real life deployments of such a scenario?

     

     

    Thanks.



  • 2.  RE: Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Mar 28, 2014 08:48 AM

    While a bit off topic here, what wired switches do you have and do they support DHCP snooping?



  • 3.  RE: Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

    Posted Apr 02, 2014 03:22 AM
    Weird I thought dhcp snooping only protected you from rogue dhcp servers by creating trust boundaries that prevented key responses (such as offer and acknowledge) from being sent back to the requestor. But it did not protect you from a requestor who was repeatedly asking for addresses from a spoofed mac? Does it do more than that?

    Nicholas Sheridan
    EBRD Networks
    Desk: +44 (0) 20 7338 6996
    Mobile: +44 (0) 7551 126097
    Mail: sheridan@ebrd.com

    ______________________________________________________________
    This message may contain privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake, please keep it confidential and return it to the sender.
    Although we have taken steps to minimise the risk of transmitting software viruses, the EBRD accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused by computer viruses and would advise you to carry out your own virus checks.
    The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views of the EBRD.


  • 4.  RE: Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Apr 02, 2014 04:56 AM

    Nik,

     

    Let's get back to your first comment....

     

    We cannot respond with CPPM to a copy of a DHCP request, with any type of enforcement, no.

     

    If you have an Aruba Controller you can enable "prevent-dhcp-exhuastion"  http://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_63_Web_Help/Web_Help_Index.htm#ArubaFrameStyles/1CommandList/firewall.htm

     



  • 5.  RE: Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

    Posted Mar 29, 2014 02:52 AM
    I thought dhcp snooping only protected you from rogue dhcp servers by creating trust boundaries that prevented key responses from being sent back to the requestor. But it did nothing protect you from a requestor who was repeatedly asking for address from a changing Mac address ? Does it do more than that?


  • 6.  RE: Clearpass DHCP Fingerprinting & Defence against Erroneous Leases

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Mar 29, 2014 07:32 AM

    Nik,

     

    If you limited only one or two mac addresses to a port on that physical switch, you would protect against that.