Wired Intelligent Edge

 View Only
last person joined: yesterday 

Bring performance and reliability to your network with the HPE Aruba Networking Core, Aggregation, and Access layer switches. Discuss the latest features and functionality of your switching devices, and find ways to improve security across your network to bring together a mobile-first solution
Expand all | Collapse all

GVRP Problem on 2510-24

This thread has been viewed 0 times
  • 1.  GVRP Problem on 2510-24

    Posted Jan 19, 2011 12:38 PM

    This switch and other same type swithes don't receive any GVRP advertises from other brand/type GVRP enabled switches. The GVRP enabled port doesn't become a member of advertised VLAN automaticaly even there is same VLAN ID untagged on other ports. I connect this switch to another switch on port 26. I have read that there is bug on previous version of firmware related GVRP on tagged ports (PR_1000385623) but it has been solved on Release Q.10.04. How can I deal with this? Currently I'm using firmware Release Q.11.17.

     

    What is the different between J9019A and J9019B? Can I use J9019A firmware (Release Q.11.26) on J9019B?

     


    #gvrp


  • 2.  RE: GVRP Problem on 2510-24

    Posted Jan 25, 2011 04:44 AM

    Hello!

     

    You may be hitting a bug that was fixed in Q.11.18, where the switch stops emitting GVRP when changing lern mode on a port. Additionally there was a later fix where the switch was sometimes learning VLANs on ports blocked by spanning tree (in Q.11.25).

     

    You may want to load the latest published software version onto the switch: http://h10144.www1.hp.com/customercare/support/software/summarypages/q-j9019-c.htm

     

    The difference between revision A and revision B products usually have to do with manufacturing changes. The software versions will work on all revisions unless specifically mentioned on the software download page. In your case, you will have absolutely no problems updating.

     

    Should the software update not resolve the issue, then I suggest contacting warranty support so the issue can be analysed. It is theoretically possible there is a bug which would need fixing, however it does sound like a configuration issue first hand.

     

    Kind regards,

    Michael Olsen