Wired Intelligent Edge

 View Only
last person joined: yesterday 

Bring performance and reliability to your network with the HPE Aruba Networking Core, Aggregation, and Access layer switches. Discuss the latest features and functionality of your switching devices, and find ways to improve security across your network to bring together a mobile-first solution
Expand all | Collapse all

Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

This thread has been viewed 78 times
  • 1.  Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 19, 2022 12:57 PM
    Good day all,

    I'm having issues properly setting up the management vlan. The management vlan is 22, and the dev vlan is 28 (in which my computer is located). Besides the switches there are meraki wireless access points in the management vlan 22. I can ping the meraki devices non-stop and never get a glitch. However, when I ping the management interface of any switch in management vlan 22, I get about 50% loss. Usually there is a chunk that responds well, then a bunch of time-outs, then more success, then more time-outs. Consitently inconsistent in a way. What am I missing here?

    The switches are mostly 2530s with a few 2920s thrown in.

    - I checked spanning-tree settings and all switches have the same config hash.
    - I checked the messages log in the switches and get no errors or alerts (other than ntp server not available, but that's should be a non-related problem I think)
    - I put a windows machine into the management vlan 22 and tried pinging it but in this case everything gets lost

    My assumption is that I am somehow not understanding the aruba concept of the management vlan well, I would appreciate any pointers or clarifications concerning what the management vlan does and does not.



    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 19, 2022 03:47 PM
    Hi Ronald, when a VLAN is configured to be the Management VLAN it becomes not routable so, if this is your case, Ping tests should be done between hosts or between switches or any other combination of them if they are all placed WITHIN that VLAN.

    If instead the VLAN you call Management VLAN is not configured to be the Management VLAN (not routed) but is just a normal VLAN that you use for Management purposes it could be routed (provided that there is a router or a routing Switch doing so for your VLANs).

    Considering both scenarios and using correctly placed hosts I don't expect any of the issues you're experiencing (RTT for directly connected Switches should generally be below 300 micro seconds or below 0.3 ms) but this is true only if the Switches are not under heavy loads (heavy CPU usage) and IF the network is stable from the point of view of Spanning Tree topology.

    Did you check that?

    ------------------------------
    Davide Poletto
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 19, 2022 04:44 PM

    Thank you for your response! The management VLAN is configured as such on the switches. The router is a Meraki MX, so the router does not consider VLAN 22 non-routable. This would explain why the Access Points in the same VLAN are unaffected by the described phenomenon. It still confuses me though, because we have identical setups on two other sites, and we can ping switches on those management VLANS (also configured to be management vlan on the switches) without any hickups, even over a VPN.

    Follow-up question:
    If the router deals with the management VLAN as wit hany other VLAN, have we at that point defeated the purpose of a management VLAN and should just make it a standard VLAN? I'm personally inclined to think so but I would appreciate educated opinions on that.



    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 19, 2022 05:51 PM
    Well, my answer to your follow-up question should be...a  yes...even if transporting (tagged) that Management VLAN id (so a VLAN which is not routable by the Switch itself when the Switch operates in Layer 3 mode thus with IP Routing enabled) up to an external router should not invalidate the main purpose of having such not routable (Management) VLAN exactly because it will continue to be simply not routable (so, no matter the presence of the Meraki MX on that VLAN, only directly connected - IIRC tagged - peers should be able to reach involved hosts/switches belonging to that VLAN).

    The reason of using a Management VLAN (and not simply an ordinary VLAN for Management purposes) is to have an isolated segment to securely manage Switches from a management workstation.

    ------------------------------
    Davide Poletto
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 19, 2022 06:49 PM
    That makes sense and we should head down that route. However, it may not solve the issue at hand. I tested disabling the 'management' function to make it just an ordinary VLAN, but I get the same ping symptoms. 

    I might add, all aruba switches operate on L2 only. The Meraki is the only router in the topology. I appear to have this issue only at one of 3 sites, so now I'm starting to think the router is problematic.

    What made me assume it was the switches is that any other kind of host (Access Point, windows PC) in the that VLAN responds to ping with no glitches. Only the switches time out periodically. And only on this site. The behaviour vaguely reminds me of a broadcast storm but I triple checked the spanning-tree setup and alert messages, also looked at the traffic using wireshark, and can't find any further evidence.

    Any other/further thoughts or suggestions will be much appreciated!

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 20, 2022 01:37 AM
    Hi Ronald

    After what you did / found out previously, this seems to be more of a forwarding issue than a misconfiguration on the switch itself. Did you check the following?

    - What is the result if you pinged from one switch to the other (e.g. within the same VLAN with only L2 components in between)?
    - Do you have any kind of redundant paths on the way between your test workstation and the switch management interface (LACP / redundant routed paths)?
    - Does the router in VLAN22 show any signs of a possible IP conflict and therefore flapping ARP entries?
    - Since routing is involved here, did you also check if the return path is properly routed? So does the switch know the proper default gateway address and does this gateway then have a proper path back to your workstation where you started the ping from?


    Best regards,
    Thomas

    ------------------------------
    Thomas Siegenthaler
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 20, 2022 12:55 PM

    Thanks for these pointers, Thomas! 
    There are no redundant routed paths, but there are multiple LACP links in the topology. And I notice something here. Given this network path:


    Test-host(Vlan28)------Switch#1------MerakiMX(Router)------Switch#1(Vlan22)====[LACP]====Switch#2(Vlan22)


    Pinging from Test-host in Vlan28 to the switch interfaces in Vlan22, here are the results:


    Test-host to Switch#1 = 1-2ms with occasional spikes (100ms+), 0% loss
    Test-host to Switch#2 = 1-2ms with frequent spikes and blocks of timeouts, 14% loss
    Switch#1 to Switch#2 = 2-3ms with some mild spikes (6-10ms), 0% loss
    Switch#2 to Switch#1 = 2-3ms with some mild spikes (6-10ms), 0% loss
    Switch#1 to Test-host = 100% loss
    Switch#2 to Test-host = 100% loss

    Perhaps many odd things here, but what sticks out to me is that intermittent loss starts to occurr as soon as I go past Switch#1. At first I thought that could be a LACP, but I tried with 3 other switches uplinked to Switch#1 via non-LACP links and get the same interruptions on 2 out of 3. Besides, I checked all LACP interfaces from the perspective of each, and everything lines up. No split LACP, links down, etc. I'm getting more confused by the minute.

    I double-checked. There are 15 hosts total in Vlan22, all with static IPs and no conflicts. The vlan22 gateway is properly configured on all switches.



    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 21, 2022 05:04 AM
    Hi Ronald, looking at this part of your representation:
    Switch#1------MerakiMX(Router)------Switch#1(Vlan22)
    Could you better explain us how Meraki MX ( Router of SVI VLAN 28 and 22) is physically connected to Switch 1 (which is, as I can understand, just a Layer 2 extension of the Meraki LAN Ports)?
    I guess you would have chosen to use one LAN Port of Meraki MX per VLAN (say LAN 1 for VLAN 22 untagged or tagged member of VLAN 22 downlinked to Switch 1 Port X untagged or tagged member of the very same VLAN....and...LAN 2 for VLAN 28 untagged or tagged member of VLAN 28 downlinked to Switch 1 Port Y untagged or tagged member of the very same VLAN)...or - just another example (an implementation which I tend to prefer) - eventually just the only one, say, Meraki MX LAN 1 Port for carrying both VLAN 22 and VLAN 28 (and to manage their SVIs) as tagged members of both VLANs downlinked to Switch 1 Port Z with Port Z necessarily tagged member of both VLAN 22 and 23?
    Basically is two physical legs (with each leg carrying its specific VLAN) or one physical leg (carrying all VLANs) from Meraki MX to Switch 1?





  • 9.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 21, 2022 12:41 PM
    Thanks for the clarification questions! Using your terminology, one leg between switch#1 and the MX, VLANs 22 and 28 tagged on both ends of the link.

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 21, 2022 01:42 PM
    Perfect...so in a scenario where an Host 1 (IP+Mask+DG of VLAN x) connected to Switch 1 Port n untagged member of VLAN x (and correctly set as an access port) performs ping test to an Host 2 (IP+Mask+DG of VLAN y) connected to Switch 1 Port m untagged member of VLAN y (and correctly set as an access port), I expect to see no ping loss at all (maybe some rtt spikes due to latency variance related to Meraki processing ICMP low priority traffic) and vice-versa in the opposite direction (from Host 2 to Host 1).

    Can you confirm?





  • 11.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 23, 2022 01:14 PM
    I can confirm, assuming vlan x = vlan 28 (dev) and vlan y = vlan 22 (manage). Tested using two Windows hosts, and ping is 100% success both ways. The issue seems to only appear with the switch interfaces in vlan 22. Everything else communicates without any hickups.

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 23, 2022 06:11 PM
    Hi Ronald,

    You wrote "The issue seems to only appear with the switch interfaces in vlan 22." and that's the part I don't understand.

    If Host 1 <-- ICMP --> Host 2 traffic is correctly routed in both directions (1->2 and 2->1) and the RTT is consistent without any packet loss, where exactly is the issue you reported?

    Switch 1 is acting as Layer 2 extension of the Meraki MX Router's LAN port (tagged with VLAN x and y) so you should consider that Switch 1 should have (for its management traffic) a one of the two VLANs (say VLAN x) with an IP Address (Switch IP on VLAN x) and it should have a Default Gateway IP Address on that very VLAN (the DG should be the Meraki LAN port IP on VLAN x at this point), you could also set the IP Address on the other VLAN y but without routing enabled (and I believe routing feature should be disabled and stay disabled  - on switches supporting it - on both Switch 1 and Switch 2) but I believe this will be not useful at all from the Switch 1 perspective.


    ------------------------------
    Davide Poletto
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 23, 2022 07:17 PM
    Thanks for the clarifying question. Here is another way of explaining the phenomenon:

    (Computer#1 in VLAN 28)-------------ICMP-------------(Computer#2 in VLAN 22) no problem, 100% success
    This holds true regardless of having one or multiple switches between computers.

    (Computer#1 in VLAN 28)-------------ICMP-------------(most switch interfaces in VLAN 22) some time outs, 80% success
    This is the case from any computer in VLAN 28, connected to any of the switches with native VLAN 28 on the port to the computer.

    Any other hosts in VLAN 22 respond to ping request from VLAN 28 perfectly. It is only a group of switches (5 out of 7 on this site) which act up. All switch interfaces in VLAN 22 have the same Subnet, Mask, and Gateway configured as Computer#2. But every half minute or so they won't respond to ICMP for about 5 seconds. This is very frustrating in terms of configuring the switches - SSH sessions get reset every few moments. Production and office traffic in other VLANS is not affected. 

    I hope this explains the issue a bit better. Please keep asking questions if I still don't make sense.

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 24, 2022 01:24 AM
    Hi Ronald

    would it be possible to share the entire config of one of the switches in question?
    And can you please let us know which software version you are running?

    Best regards,
    Thomas

    ------------------------------
    Thomas Siegenthaler
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 24, 2022 07:02 AM
    Also...a basic network topology would be of help (with the VLAN membership status of all involved uplink/downlink ports too)...since the whole network path involves more that just two switches.

    ------------------------------
    Davide Poletto
    ------------------------------



  • 16.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 24, 2022 01:32 PM
    Absolutely.
    First, the switch config, starting with the core switch that uplinks to the MX

    ; hpStack_WB Configuration Editor; Created on release #WB.16.10.0009
    ; Ver #14:21.44.08.15.9b.3f.b3.b8.ee.34.79.3c.29.eb.9f.fc.f3.ff.37.ef:29

    stacking
    member 1 type "J9729A" mac-address 308d99-91ea00
    member 2 type "J9729A" mac-address 308d99-938680
    exit
    hostname "sw-hl-stacked-switch"
    aruba-central disable
    trunk 1/47-1/48 trk1 lacp
    trunk 2/45-2/46 trk2 lacp         ----> this is the link to the switch with the below config
    trunk 2/47-2/48 trk3 lacp
    trunk 2/3 trk4 trunk
    trunk 2/28 trk5 trunk
    gvrp
    timesync ntp
    ntp unicast
    ntp server 10.10.10.8 iburst
    ntp enable
    telnet-server listen data
    time daylight-time-rule continental-us-and-canada
    time timezone -480
    web-management listen data
    ip default-gateway 10.0.22.1            --------> VLAN 22 gateway
    ip ssh listen data
    interface 2/14
    no power-over-ethernet
    exit
    interface 2/31
    unknown-vlans disable
    exit
    snmp-server listen data
    snmp-server contact "Installed 2015-12-30" location "Hallert server room wall stack"
    snmpv3 enable
    snmpv3 only
    snmpv3 group managerpriv user "librenms" sec-model ver3
    snmpv3 user "librenms"
    oobm
    disable
    ip address dhcp-bootp
    member 1
    ip address dhcp-bootp
    exit
    member 2
    ip address dhcp-bootp
    exit
    exit
    vlan 1
    name "DEFAULT_VLAN"
    no untagged 1/43-1/44,1/46,2/14,2/17,2/19-2/20,2/22-2/23,2/36
    untagged 1/1-1/33,1/35-1/42,1/45,2/1-2/2,2/4-2/13,2/15-2/16,2/18,2/21,2/24-2/27,2/29-2/35,2/37-2/44,Trk1-Trk5
    tagged 1/34
    no ip address
    ipv6 enable
    ipv6 address autoconfig
    exit
    vlan 22
    name "HL Management"
    tagged 1/46,2/42,Trk4-Trk5
    ip address 10.0.22.100 255.255.255.0
    ipv6 enable
    ipv6 address autoconfig
    exit
    vlan 23
    name "HL Office"
    untagged 2/20
    tagged 1/46
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 24
    name "HL Production"
    tagged 1/46
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 25
    name "HL Security"
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 26
    name "HL Wlan"
    tagged 1/46,Trk4-Trk5
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 27
    name "HL Argus"
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 28
    name "HL Development"
    untagged 1/43-1/44,2/14,2/17,2/19,2/22-2/23,2/36
    tagged 1/46,Trk4
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 29
    name "HL Accounting"
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 33
    name "Talk Talk"
    tagged 1/46
    no ip address
    exit
    vlan 50
    name "HL - PC Transport Vlan"
    tagged 1/46,2/31
    no ip address
    exit
    management-vlan 22
    spanning-tree
    spanning-tree 2/31 bpdu-filter
    spanning-tree Trk1 priority 4
    spanning-tree Trk2 priority 4
    spanning-tree Trk3 priority 4
    spanning-tree Trk4 priority 4
    spanning-tree Trk5 priority 4
    spanning-tree config-name "hallert"
    spanning-tree config-revision 2
    spanning-tree instance 1 vlan 1 20-30
    spanning-tree instance 1 priority 0
    spanning-tree instance 1 Trk1 priority 4
    spanning-tree instance 1 Trk2 priority 4
    spanning-tree instance 1 Trk3 priority 4
    spanning-tree instance 1 Trk4 priority 4
    spanning-tree instance 1 Trk5 priority 4
    spanning-tree priority 0
    no tftp server
    tftp server listen data
    no autorun
    no dhcp config-file-update
    no dhcp image-file-update
    device-profile name "default-ap-profile"
    cos 0
    exit
    activate software-update disable
    activate provision disable
    password manager
    password operator

    And then a switch that has gaps in ping response

    ; J9776A Configuration Editor; Created on release #YA.16.10.0009
    ; Ver #14:41.44.00.04.19.02.13.98.82.34.61.18.28.f3.84.9c.63.ff.37.27:05
    hostname "sw-hl-server-rack-bottom"
    aruba-central disable
    trunk 23-24 trk2 lacp         ----> this is the link to the switch with the above config
    gvrp
    timesync timep
    ntp unicast
    ntp server 10.10.10.8
    ntp enable
    time daylight-time-rule continental-us-and-canada
    time timezone -480
    ip default-gateway 10.0.22.1          --------> VLAN 22 gateway
    ip timep dhcp
    snmp-server location "Hallert Server Room Rack Pos. 23"
    snmpv3 enable
    snmpv3 only
    snmpv3 group managerpriv user "librenms" sec-model ver3
    snmpv3 user "librenms"
    vlan 1
    name "DEFAULT_VLAN"
    untagged 1-22,25-28,Trk2
    no ip address
    ipv6 enable
    ipv6 address autoconfig
    exit
    vlan 22
    name "HL Management"
    tagged Trk2
    ip address 10.0.22.103 255.255.255.0
    ipv6 enable
    ipv6 address autoconfig
    exit
    management-vlan 22
    spanning-tree
    spanning-tree Trk2 priority 4
    spanning-tree config-name "hallert"
    spanning-tree config-revision 2
    spanning-tree instance 1 vlan 1 20-30
    spanning-tree instance 1 Trk2 priority 4
    no tftp server
    loop-protect mode vlan
    loop-protect vlan 1
    no dhcp config-file-update
    no dhcp image-file-update
    activate software-update disable
    activate provision disable
    password manager
    password operator

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 17.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 24, 2022 01:46 PM
    And here is a network map. The first config I shared is of the 'Stacked Switch' and the second is of "Serverrack-Bottom"

    All switches have GVRP enabled. However, VLAN 22 is manually configured on some uplink/downlink ports
    - Serverrack bottom: tagged only on TRK2 -> link to Stacked switch
    - Stacked switch: GVRP tagged on Trk1-3 (LACP links), manually tagged on 1/46 (to MX) and all other downlink ports

    Spanning-tree is enabled and configured as per the shared configs.



    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 24, 2022 02:32 PM
    To me, that "management-vlan 22" on both configuration files (apart from other more or less questionable items) looks strange: that way VLAN 22 become not routable.





  • 19.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 24, 2022 03:00 PM
    Yeah, not surprised you spot some questionable items. Work in progress.

    In response to your specific observation:
    - I have (now again) tried making VLan 22 a standard VLan. It does not change the symptoms.
    - I have switches in management VLans routed through MX devices on 2 more sites. No issues there, only on this site.

    Here is a screenshot of the ping process: (from host in VLan 28)


    To my untrained eye it would seem like spanning-tree is re-routing the traffic every 10-30 seconds but I find no evidence of spanningtree changing the topography.

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 24, 2022 03:11 PM
    Adding some explanation, port 2/31 which has the BPDU filter enabled is an uplink to a different site via Ubiquity AirFiber. I am filtering BPDUs on both ends of that link to prevent both topologies from interfering with one another. We've had issues with that in the past when the AirFiber would get flaky and this would cause spanningtree to re-adjust the topology constantly. Since then I've implemented the filters and specific MST instances for each site. Just clarifying what that's for.

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 21.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 25, 2022 05:43 AM
    I'm not totally sure how to evaluate the Spanning Tree configuration (with MSTP and just one instance):

    spanning-tree config-name "hallert"
    spanning-tree config-revision 2
    spanning-tree instance 1 vlan 1 20-30
    spanning-tree instance 1 priority 0

    of backplane stacked Aruba 2920 switches on the top and:

    spanning-tree config-name "hallert"
    spanning-tree config-revision 2
    spanning-tree instance 1 vlan 1 20-30

    of Serverrack switch on the bottom, given the topology you posted.

    ------------------------------
    Davide Poletto
    ------------------------------



  • 22.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 25, 2022 11:27 AM
    Excellent question. I configured MSTP partially because the tutorial I followed did so, but also because I was trying to think ahead to a scenario in which it would be beneficial to have a different topology for some VLANS.

    The stacked switch is configured as root as per request from my supervisor. Eventually it may take over the inter-VLAN routing role from the Meraki MX.

    Does this answer your question somewhat?

    I'm considering disabling redunant link ports and dismantling all LACP links to see if a simpler setup does a way with the problem. Is that something you would consider worthwhile?

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 23.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 26, 2022 12:33 PM
    Alright, I believe I solved it. A spanning-tree issue after all, if I understand this correctly.
    Configuration with bad networking symptoms:
    - MSTP instance 1 with mapped Vlans 1,20-30
    - VLAN 1 linked to MX router from Switch#A
    - VLAN 20-30 linked to MX router from Switch#B (root switch for mstp instance 1)

    The ICMP-to-SwitchInterface-loss stopped as soon as I added VLAN 1 to the same link as VLANs 20-30, uplinked from Switch#B

    Preliminary conclusion:
    - Though there was no actual loop in any VLan, there was an awkward topology for MSTP instance 1
    - Since Switch#B is the root switch for instance 1, all VLANS mapped to that instance should have been uplinked from that Switch, including VLAN 1

    Still pondering this:
    - If the issue was with VLAN 1, why are the symptoms only evident when pinging the switch interfaces in VLAN 22?
    - Why were there no Spanning-Tree errors or warnings? Because there was no real loop, but just an awkward setup?
    - I have a similar setup at another site, Router uplinks of VLANS in the same MSTP instance from multiple switches. It seems to work there without issues. (Although I see that it should be changed)

    @parnassus @thomasbnc thank you so much for your input and patience. I would apreciate any comments on my conclusion before it is closed.​​​​

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------



  • 24.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    MVP GURU
    Posted May 27, 2022 03:38 AM
    Hello Ronald, could you explain what is the purpose of having such MSTP setup considering the topology you're dealing with?

    ------------------------------
    Davide Poletto
    ------------------------------



  • 25.  RE: Inconsistent ping/access to Aruba Switch management interfaces

    Posted May 27, 2022 11:40 AM
    Two reasons:
    1. I'm still quite new to networking. When I set up Spanning-Tree a year ago I followed a tutorial which went straight to setting up MSTP rather than just STP. The tutorial just left it at a single instance, hence did I.
    2. When I realized that MSTP may not really be necessary, I decided to leave it in place in case our traffic requirements change and it would make sense to point traffic to a different root switch.

    On that note: As you can see from the toplogy, we have downlinks from the MX to two different switches, and I had different VLANS (from the same MST instance) tagged on each of those downlinks, which seems to have created the problem. If my conclusion is correct, it would be better if the VLANS uplinked to the MX from Switch#1 have Switch#1 as their STP root, and the VLANS uplinked from Switch#2 have Switch#2 as their STP root. That would require 2 instances. Does that make sense?

    I'm glad the immediate issue is resolved, but I am very open to farther reaching suggestions. As mentioned, I am still pretty new to networking.

    Also let me know if I haven't managed to answer your question well. I wasn't sure if you mean "Why MSTP?" or "Why MSTP in this particular way?"

    ------------------------------
    Ronald Ratzlaff
    ------------------------------