Wired Intelligent Edge

last person joined: yesterday 

Bring performance and reliability to your network with the HPE Aruba Networking Core, Aggregation, and Access layer switches. Discuss the latest features and functionality of your switching devices, and find ways to improve security across your network to bring together a mobile-first solution
Expand all | Collapse all

ArubaOS-CX: Understanding VSX LAG states inconsistency of Partner ports

This thread has been viewed 12 times
  • 1.  ArubaOS-CX: Understanding VSX LAG states inconsistency of Partner ports

    MVP GURU
    Posted Apr 29, 2019 05:44 AM

    I'm struggling to understand why I obtain two different Distributing/Non-Distributing states for the very same interface of a VSX LAG (lag 10 on our VSX) when I execute two CLI commands that should apparently provide a common result (with regard to the above mentioned states):

     

    First, please consider the output of show lacp interface multi-chassis for the interface 1/1/19 only member of the 2 ports VSX LAG named lag 10...note that Partner (the local VSX Member, primary node, where I'm logged in) and Remote Partner details (the remote VSX Peer, secondary node) show different results ALFNCD versus only ALFNC:

     

    Aruba-8320-1# show lacp interfaces multi-chassis
    
    State abbreviations :
    A - Active        P - Passive      F - Aggregable I - Individual
    S - Short-timeout L - Long-timeout N - InSync     O - OutofSync
    C - Collecting    D - Distributing 
    X - State m/c expired              E - Default neighbor state
    
    Actor details of all interfaces:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Intf    Aggregate  Port    Port     State   System-ID         System   Aggr    
            name       id      Priority                           Priority Key     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1/1/19  lag10(mc)  19      1        ALFNCD  d0:67:26:XX:XX:XX 65534    10      
    
    
    Partner details of all interfaces:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Intf    Aggregate  Partner Port     State   System-ID         System   Aggr    
            name       Port-id Priority                           Priority Key     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1/1/19  lag10(mc)  1       128      ALFNCD  00:14:5e:99:54:8c 32768    48879   
    
    
    Remote Actor details of all interfaces:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Intf   Aggregate  Port    Port     State   System-ID         System   Aggr    
           name       id      Priority                           Priority Key     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1/1/19 lag10(mc)  1019    1        ALFNCD  d0:67:26:XX:XX:XX 65534    10      
    
    
    Remote Partner details of all interfaces:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Intf   Aggregate  Partner Port     State   System-ID         System   Aggr    
           name       Port-id Priority                           Priority Key     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1/1/19 lag10(mc)  2       128      ALFNC   00:14:5e:99:54:8c 32768    48879   

    Watching the output above it looks like 1/1/19 on Remote Partner, a Server, is not Distributing...conversely...if I drill down to discover if that difference is found also with commands show lacp interfaces multi-chassis 1/1/19 and show lacp interfaces multi-chassis 1/1/19 vsx-peer I immediately found instead that:

     

    Aruba-8320-1# show lacp interfaces multi-chassis 1/1/19
    
    State abbreviations :
    A - Active        P - Passive      F - Aggregable I - Individual
    S - Short-timeout L - Long-timeout N - InSync     O - OutofSync
    C - Collecting    D - Distributing 
    X - State m/c expired              E - Default neighbor state
    
    
    Aggregate-name : lag10(multi-chassis)
    -------------------------------------------------
                           Actor             Partner
    -------------------------------------------------
    Port-id            | 19                 | 1                  
    Port-priority      | 1                  | 128                
    Key                | 10                 | 48879              
    State              | ALFNCD             | ALFNCD             
    System-ID          | d0:67:26:XX:XX:XX  | 00:14:5e:99:54:8c  
    System-priority    | 65534              | 32768              
    
    Aruba-8320-1# show lacp interfaces multi-chassis 1/1/19 vsx-peer 
    
    State abbreviations :
    A - Active        P - Passive      F - Aggregable I - Individual
    S - Short-timeout L - Long-timeout N - InSync     O - OutofSync
    C - Collecting    D - Distributing 
    X - State m/c expired              E - Default neighbor state
    
    
    Aggregate-name : lag10(multi-chassis)
    -------------------------------------------------
                           Actor             Partner
    -------------------------------------------------
    Port-id            | 1019               | 2                  
    Port-priority      | 1                  | 128                
    Key                | 10                 | 48879              
    State              | ALFNCD             | ALFNCD             
    System-ID          | d0:67:26:XX:XX:XX  | 00:14:5e:99:54:8c  
    System-priority    | 65534              | 32768

    there is no difference - both partner interfaces look Distributing "D" -  for Partner port-id 1 (connected to 1/1/19 on local VSX I'm logged in) and for Partner port-id 2 (connected to 1/1/19 on remote VSX Peer).

     

    What is the reason for such VSX LAG status difference? Am I misunderstanding those concurrent outputs?



  • 2.  RE: ArubaOS-CX: Understanding VSX LAG states inconsistency of Partner ports

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Apr 29, 2019 05:49 AM

    This is a known bug (fix is not yet here...). Thanks for reporting.



  • 3.  RE: ArubaOS-CX: Understanding VSX LAG states inconsistency of Partner ports

    MVP GURU
    Posted Apr 29, 2019 06:04 AM

    Hello Vincent, OK...is there, in your opinion, a relationship also with a (similar) scenario reported here



  • 4.  RE: ArubaOS-CX: Understanding VSX LAG states inconsistency of Partner ports

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Apr 29, 2019 06:09 AM

    I don't think so, but not sure. I'll check (allow few days).



  • 5.  RE: ArubaOS-CX: Understanding VSX LAG states inconsistency of Partner ports

    MVP GURU
    Posted Apr 29, 2019 06:22 AM

    Thank you.