As the title suggests I ask the experts to help me shed some light about a comparison between ArubaOS-CX 10.01.0050 and ArubaOS-CX 10.02.0010 (both latest released at time of writing this post).
Since ArubaOS-CX 10.02.0001 was forked directly from ArubaOS-CX 10.01.0001 I'm trying to figure out if the entire ArubaOS-CX 10.02 software branch embeds (backport?) some or all [*] of the fixes released during the whole ArubaOS-CX 10.01 software release cycle (so between ArubaOS-CX 10.01.001 and ArubaOS-CX 10.01.0050).
[*] ...only if they were really necessary on the new ArubaOS-CX 10.02 code.
The above question will help me to figure out what is the most solid path [**] to follow in upgrading a running Aruba 8320 VSX actually based on ArubaOS-CX 10.01.0030: should I stay on ArubaOS-CX 10.01 branch and update to 10.01.0050 or move on and do the jump by updating to 10.02.0010?
Is it reasonable to stay on ArubaOS-CX 10.01 during 2019 considering that actual ArubaOS-CX software branches can't be concurrently developed too long [***]?
[**] purely from the VSX, System Stability and Layer 2 features (VSX LAGs, Port MTU, etc.) standpoint, my scenario actually doesn't involve particular Layer 3 features...also I can sacrifice new features like (so much desired) orchestrated VSX software update in the name of software code proven maturity.
[***] see here.