Wireless Access

Reply
Highlighted
Contributor II

have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

Dears, Hvae any one tried to mesh on such a distance before and what is the expected data rates on 40 MHZ with clear LoS

AMFX#86 |ACMX | ACCX |ACDX | ACI |HPECI| ACEAP | CWSP | CWDP | CWNA | CCNP |HP ASE | MCITP
If you Found My Post Helping you kindly Give KUDOS and if it solved your question Kindly hit Accept as a solution box.

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
MVP Expert

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

MST200 at HT40 should give you the attached plots (with clear LoS, no fresnel zone issues, etc). Follow the red line for HT40. If you need HT20, drop those rates by approx 50% (roughly). At 3km you should be around 70-80Mbps HT40, or around 35-40Mbps HT20.HT40 rate v range


Jerrod Howard
Distinguished Technologist, TME

View solution in original post


All Replies
Highlighted
All-Decade MVP 2020

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

Are you looking to just do a bridge? If so you might want to look into the MST200.
ACDX #419 | ACMP |
Highlighted
Contributor II

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

I will give it a shoot and see what will happen but have you tried it before I have tried 1.5 km worked well like 117mb data rate but 3 km will be chalange
AMFX#86 |ACMX | ACCX |ACDX | ACI |HPECI| ACEAP | CWSP | CWDP | CWNA | CCNP |HP ASE | MCITP
If you Found My Post Helping you kindly Give KUDOS and if it solved your question Kindly hit Accept as a solution box.
Highlighted
MVP Expert

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

MST200 at HT40 should give you the attached plots (with clear LoS, no fresnel zone issues, etc). Follow the red line for HT40. If you need HT20, drop those rates by approx 50% (roughly). At 3km you should be around 70-80Mbps HT40, or around 35-40Mbps HT20.HT40 rate v range


Jerrod Howard
Distinguished Technologist, TME

View solution in original post

Highlighted
Contributor II

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

Thanks Man really add value I will check once I got the equipment and feed you back

AMFX#86 |ACMX | ACCX |ACDX | ACI |HPECI| ACEAP | CWSP | CWDP | CWNA | CCNP |HP ASE | MCITP
If you Found My Post Helping you kindly Give KUDOS and if it solved your question Kindly hit Accept as a solution box.
Highlighted
Contributor II

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

One more thing now ANT 5614 is 60 degreee I belive 5314 will be more focused which may give better link quality

AMFX#86 |ACMX | ACCX |ACDX | ACI |HPECI| ACEAP | CWSP | CWDP | CWNA | CCNP |HP ASE | MCITP
If you Found My Post Helping you kindly Give KUDOS and if it solved your question Kindly hit Accept as a solution box.
Highlighted
MVP Expert

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

They are effectively the same (MST200 is 14dBi with 55deg horizontal and 13deg vertical; 5614 is 14dBi 60deg horizontal with 14deg vertical). 


Jerrod Howard
Distinguished Technologist, TME
Highlighted
Occasional Contributor II

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

is 5614 is the same as 5314!!

MVP Expert

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

The 5314 is also a 14dBi antenna, but is 30deg x 30deg, the 4614 is a 14dBi antenna and is 60deg x 15deg.


Jerrod Howard
Distinguished Technologist, TME
Highlighted
Contributor II

Re: have any one did a mesh between 2 MSRs with ANT-2x2-5314 for 3 Km distance?

thats what I mean 30 Degree is more focused

AMFX#86 |ACMX | ACCX |ACDX | ACI |HPECI| ACEAP | CWSP | CWDP | CWNA | CCNP |HP ASE | MCITP
If you Found My Post Helping you kindly Give KUDOS and if it solved your question Kindly hit Accept as a solution box.
Search Airheads
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: