Wireless Water Cooler

last person joined: 17 days ago 

Hang out and socialize with other community members in this off topic forum. Everything from industry trends to hobbies and interests are welcomed!
Expand all | Collapse all

Transmit beam forming vs spatial multiplexing

This thread has been viewed 4 times
  • 1.  Transmit beam forming vs spatial multiplexing

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Sep 27, 2015 11:27 AM

    Team

     

    Can Spatial streams and tranmsit beamforming co-exist ? As per my understadning of 802.11n during spatial mutiplexixing diffrent frames are sent through antenna elements which give better throughput but in tranmsit beamforming two frames will be sent in diffrent phases and if both reaches in client in constructive phase client will get signal with better RSSI . Long story short . Tx beamforming will give tranmsit power to clients with limited throughput while spatila multiplexing will give better throughput to clients if they are nearby .. Does this behaviour changed in 802.11ac ? Can 802.11ac APs beamform individual streams ?

     

    George Isaac

    newdaywireless.wordpress.com 



  • 2.  RE: Transmit beam forming vs spatial multiplexing

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Sep 27, 2015 07:30 PM

    @Ejohnson can probably help with this question.



  • 3.  RE: Transmit beam forming vs spatial multiplexing

    Posted Sep 28, 2015 10:07 AM

    Spatial multiplexing is the process where the same informaiton is placed across 2 or more of the available antennas in an AP or Client device.

     

    Using this simple definition almost all of the operating modes on a device use spatial multiplexing.

     

    Good diagrams found here:

    http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/technology/whitepapers/WP_80211acInDepth.pdf

     

    When you have a multistream capable AP talking to a single stream device it can use CDD (Cyclic Delay Diversity aka Cyclic shift diversity) or STBC (Space time block coding)

     

    For CDD sending to a single client the AP transmits a time delayed copy of the single stream on all antennas with time delays on the order of the OFDM symbol period (3.2 microseconds). the time delays are defined in the standard. The time delays decorrelate the copies of the signal being sent so this means that there is no (or very little) beamforming occuring. Beamforming in this case would be detrmental since the AP has no information on where the user is.

     

    For STBC one stream is sent over 2 antennas or two streams over 4 antennas. there is no time delay across the signals but the data on the two antennas is decorrelated mathematically using something called an Alamouti code

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space%E2%80%93time_block_code#Alamouti.27s_code

     

    again due to the decorrelation of the signals there is no beamforming and the element pattern of the AP dictates the antenna characteristic.

     

    For Tx BF and MU MIMO

    In 11ac there is a sounding process the sounding process gives the AP a mathematical recipe for ampitude and phase on each antenna for each stream so that the signal peaks directly over the target antenna(s) on the client. In this situation the signal are correlated and the signals from the antennas are combined to form beams and to maximise the ability of the system to support more than one stream.

     

    Tx BF and MU MIMO are very closely related technologies. The underlying math for both is the same.

    The sounding process allws the AP to create orthognal antenna patterns for each stream that is being sent. In appropriate enviornments (like an indoor space with walls ceiling and floor) the system works to deliver near ideal Multi-Stream/Multi User support.

     

    So to summarize

    in the simplest sense spatial multiplexing is transmitting signal on multiple antennas that are tied to the same baseband.

    CDD/CSD and STBC do this without beamforming

        Signal are de correlated either with large time delays or by mathematical encoding

    TxBF and MU MIMO do this with beamforming

         Signals are correlated and orthogonal beams are formed

     

    Further reading

     

    3 articles starting with this one

    http://community.arubanetworks.com/t5/Technology-Blog/Wave-2-Antennas-in-the-spotlight/ba-p/228089

     

    and an Airheads deep dive on 11ac

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFo67dEGfcY

     



  • 4.  RE: Transmit beam forming vs spatial multiplexing

    EMPLOYEE
    Posted Sep 29, 2015 12:43 AM

    Spatial multiplexing is the process where the same informaiton is placed across 2 or more of the available antennas in an AP or Client device.

     

    Query : One spatial stream in 802.11ac can give upto 433 Mbps theoratical throughput . If we need to achieve 1.3Gbps we need clients which support 3 SS . Here as per my understanding all three spatial streams will carry diffrent information . Is this right understanding ? If all carrying same data payload / information then total throghupt will be only 433 Mbps . Right ? 

     

    WIki Definition of beamforming : Beamforming or spatial filtering is a signal processing technique used in sensor arraysfor directional signal transmission or reception.[1] This is achieved by combining elements in a phased array in such a way that signals at particular angles experience constructiveinterference while others experience destructive interference

     

    TxBF and MU MIMO do this with beamforming

    Signals are correlated and orthogonal beams are formed

     

    Query : How do you form orthogonal beams / achieve constructive signal correlation ? Can you do it with 1x1:1 AP ? I dont think we can do without MIMO antenna . If we are using MIMO antenna then are we sending same data payload across multiple antenna elements ?  

     

    [I am still not able to go through all links you have shared .]

     



  • 5.  RE: Transmit beam forming vs spatial multiplexing

    Posted Oct 24, 2016 12:39 AM

    Awesome, thank you Ejohnson.

    That puts things nicely into perspective.